Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: "Susan Mitchell" <medlawtrans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:18:51 -0700
We all have to do more. But letting companies pollute that we set to be
shut down because they are part of your base is a problem, and he did that
immediately when he came in office that IS his fault.
--
Sue -- Firefighter mom -- Still Rabid UW Dawg Fan!
(to reply send to medlawtrans@xxxxxxxxxxx)
"JulieW8" <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44cc3d37.56095240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:24:01 -0700, "Susan Mitchell"Truth
<medlawtrans@xxxxxxxxxxx> gave thanks and said:
It isn't a hoax. I really want to see Al Gore's move, An Inconvenient
asand read the book by the same name. It lists things individuals can do
(towell as the nation. What the idiot in the white house could have done
toanswer another post) is sign the Kyoto Treaty that other countries signed
andwork with the world on global warming. He could have continued Clinton's
plant closings, not reopen polluting plants that were set to be closed
forto not even allow discussions of off shore drilling or arctic drilling
andoil and start more discussions of safe, nonpollutant fuel alternatives
allowsheavy fines for pollutions from the companies that continues to break the
rules -- that he has continued to allow so why would he care since he
it.
From the Los Angeles Times:
"The heat was unreal, so blistering that a windowsill thermometer
overlooking Olympic Boulevard in downtown Los Angeles blew its top
when the mercury hit 130 degrees. People consumed so much water that
parts of the city briefly ran dry. Four people died. Dozens were
hospitalized.
It was still 89 degrees at 1 a.m.
The record hot spell did not occur in 2006, but 1955, long before
scientists raised the prospect of global warming and climate change."
Gore's movie is about each of us taking responsibility. Given your
political bent, I'd think you'd want less government, not more.
~~~~~*****~~~~~*****~~~~~*****
To send me e-mail, use juliew8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: JulieW8
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: Shiela
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- References:
- OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: Chuck
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: Anne Vasquez
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: Susan Mitchell
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: Anne Vasquez
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: Chuck
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: Susan Mitchell
- Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- From: JulieW8
- OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- Prev by Date: Re: Ungrateful little snot...
- Next by Date: Re: Future of Medical Transcription
- Previous by thread: Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- Next by thread: Re: OFF TOPIC: 110ºF in North Dakota
- Index(es):