Re: Kill The Troll
- From: "Karen C." <karenscribes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:06:37 -0400
"Ed Gmys" <burghbear1965@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158543997.984493.60020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am only responding to this because my name is mentioned in here.
Whoever this troll is obviously knows how to read newsgroup archives,
so it wouldn't take a brain surgeon to figure out how they got my last
name. . . .
Frankly, I've not been thinking you're the troll. I do think that the troll
must have read about the LV stink and decided you'd be a good scapegoat for
his/her sick fun and games. I've been thinking it's someone else--someone
who has loads of time on his/her hands and willing to go to extremes to play
stupid jokes. That's why I'd have to agree that it appears the idiot who
has been posting has been culling info from the archives.
To all who reply to this troll: Very disappointed in all of you. I
like to think that we have higher- or
at-least-somewhat-higher-than-average intelligence to do MT for a
living, but seeing all of you reply to this troll over and over again
and questioning why they won't go away makes me doubt that. It also
doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out if no one responded to the
troll, they would get tired and go away. Some of you are more
My sentiments, exactly. I've been wondering why in the world anybody would
respond to the idiot. Tempting as it may be, it's just a waste of time and
energy.
JMO.
Karen C.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kill The Troll
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: Kill The Troll
- References:
- Neal Loves A Good ***
- From: Sheila
- Re: You have messed up, "Sheila"
- From: Shanx
- Re: Neal Loves A Good ***
- From: Blupencl
- Kill The Troll
- From: Ed Gmys
- Neal Loves A Good ***
- Prev by Date: Re: Word '97 question
- Next by Date: Re: Kill The Troll
- Previous by thread: Kill The Troll
- Next by thread: Re: Kill The Troll
- Index(es):