Re: Should I be worried?
- From: "Ed Chait" <edchait4remove@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 04:24:37 GMT
"Sandi" <sanditypes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4ne6htFa1m5jU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would not, under any circumstances whatsoever, take a statin. Ever.
First of all, every single advertisement for a statin slips in the "not
proven to prevent or treat heart disease" disclaimer for a reason. Second,
I've no interest in trading a reduction in cholesterol for potential liver
damage. Finally, the associated flu-like symptoms have a real effect on
quality of life, and even if not everyone experiences them, they are common
enough that I wouldn't chance it. To me, it's like using an elephant gun
to kill a gnat.
Sandi
I respect your decision, even though I disagree.
ed
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should I be worried?
- From: Sandi
- Re: Should I be worried?
- References:
- Should I be worried?
- From: Judity
- Re: Should I be worried?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Should I be worried?
- From: Barbara Carlson
- Re: Should I be worried?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Should I be worried?
- From: Sandi
- Should I be worried?
- Prev by Date: Re: Asking for a raise
- Next by Date: Re: Asking for a raise
- Previous by thread: Re: Should I be worried?
- Next by thread: Re: Should I be worried?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|