Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: "Sandi" <sanditypes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:38:43 -0500
<jmorngstar@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164756777.883846.275260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We don't even have a Bible in court for swearing, although I suppose one
Marsha wrote:
I was a little taken aback with it, but a reasonablesolution, IMO, would be to have him take the oath on
both the Bible and the Koran.
Marsha/Ohio
What good would it do to have him take the oath on a book that he
doesn't believe in? You might as well have him take it with his hand
on a comic book. Why do you find it unacceptable for him to take it on
the Koran? If he swears to the Koran he is likely going to be held to
a more higher standard in his own mind and own community than if the
pinkies are on a bible.
Have we not had any athiests or agnostics elected? I can't believe
they would have sworn on a bible. You don't have to swear on a bible in
court.
Janice
could be scared up if someone really wanted one.
Sandi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- References:
- OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: Marsha
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: jmorngstar
- OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Prev by Date: Re: Sed rate
- Next by Date: Re: Huge Security Vulnerability with California Department of Worker Comp EDEX
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading