Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: "VickieHerndonCMT" <vickieboinkherndon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:32:25 -0500
I certainly would not want the office if they made me swear on the Bible if
I had other beliefs. What if I were an atheist...some here on the newsgroup
are...and I would have issues with that if I were an atheist. I don't see
what difference it makes to honor the individual's personal beliefs. If he
does his job well that is all that matters.
"Marsha" <mas@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:S5ednY5eLKXnUfHYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
jmorngstar@xxxxxxx wrote:
Marsha wrote:
I was a little taken aback with it, but a reasonable
solution, IMO, would be to have him take the oath on
both the Bible and the Koran.
Marsha/Ohio
What good would it do to have him take the oath on a book that he
doesn't believe in? You might as well have him take it with his hand
on a comic book. Why do you find it unacceptable for him to take it on
the Koran? If he swears to the Koran he is likely going to be held to
a more higher standard in his own mind and own community than if the
pinkies are on a bible.
I didn't say it was unacceptable. A lot of people who don't believe in
the Bible have served in office. This paragraph is interesting:
"For all of American history, Jews elected to public office have taken
their oath on the Bible, even though they do not believe in the New
Testament, and the many secular elected officials have not believed in the
Old Testament either. Yet those secular officials did not demand to take
their oaths of office on, say, the collected works of Voltaire or on a
volume of New York Times editorials. Nor has one Mormon official demanded
to put his hand on the Book of Mormon. And it is hard to imagine a
scientologist being allowed to take his oath of office on a copy of
"Dianetics" by L. Ron Hubbard. Devotees of multiculturalism and
political correctness who do not see how damaging to the fabric of
American civilization it is to allow Ellison to choose his own book need
only imagine a racist elected to Congress. Would they allow him to choose
Hitler's "Mein Kampf," the Nazis' bible, for his oath? And if not, why
not? On what grounds will those defending Ellison's right to choose his
favorite book deny that same right to a racist who is elected to public
office?
Have we not had any athiests or agnostics elected? I can't believe
they would have sworn on a bible. You don't have to swear on a bible in
court.
Janice
I could be wrong, but I thought all those elected to office had to swear
on a Bible. This has been quite enlightening, as I've never thought about
it before.
Marsha/Ohio
.
- References:
- OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: Marsha
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: Marsha
- OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Prev by Date: Re: Opinions, not flames please
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading