Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: "Barbara Carlson" <bbcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:22:16 -0500
I believe in court an atheist may just simply say, "I affirm" and not swear
on the Bible. While I have read the Bible and find it an interesting
history, my word is what is important. To a Muslin using the Koran (which
I have also read) would have far more meaning.
Barb C.
<jmorngstar@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164756777.883846.275260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Marsha wrote:
I was a little taken aback with it, but a reasonablesolution, IMO, would be to have him take the oath on
both the Bible and the Koran.
Marsha/Ohio
What good would it do to have him take the oath on a book that he
doesn't believe in? You might as well have him take it with his hand
on a comic book. Why do you find it unacceptable for him to take it on
the Koran? If he swears to the Koran he is likely going to be held to
a more higher standard in his own mind and own community than if the
pinkies are on a bible.
Have we not had any athiests or agnostics elected? I can't believe
they would have sworn on a bible. You don't have to swear on a bible in
court.
Janice
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: Sandi
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- References:
- OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: Marsha
- Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- From: jmorngstar
- OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Prev by Date: Re: MTs and QAs required for the Chandigarh Based Healtcare BPO
- Next by Date: Re: Opinions, not flames please
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Opinions, not flames please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|