Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: Jeannie <jwilson421@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 06:46:05 -0500
RaeMorrill <RaeMorrill.39qwb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:RaeMorrill.39qwb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
. On the other hand, aren't Jehovah Witness parents allowed
to refuse blood for their children (or have been). Why is that different
really - it could end in death instead of force d marriage or what we
consider statutory rape.
I do think they are allowed to refuse blood for their children. I think
the difference is, however, that statutory rape is against the law and I do
not believe there is a law requiring you to allow blood transfusions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: Samantha Hill - remove TRASH to reply
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- References:
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: Judity
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: mountain
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: Anne V.
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: mountain
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: Anne V.
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: Controversial Obama article
- Prev by Date: Re: Controversial Obama article
- Next by Date: Re: Controversial Obama article
- Previous by thread: Re: Controversial Obama article
- Next by thread: Re: Controversial Obama article
- Index(es):