Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?
From: Hillary Israeli (hillary_at_hillary.net)
Date: 06/21/04
- Next message: Leonid Gavrilov: "New "Engineered Negligible Senescence" book"
- Previous message: Hillary Israeli: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- In reply to: P Harris: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- Next in thread: P Harris: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- Reply: P Harris: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:12:17 +0000 (UTC)
In <81adbb66.0406201233.1b55acec@posting.google.com>,
P Harris <patberto@frontiernet.net> wrote:
*anywhere, in any study, in any field of life. It is not possible, from
*a philosophical standpoint even, to prove that ANYTHING truly causes
*ANYTHING else.
Do you think Koch's postulates prove causation of infectious disease for a
given pathogen? If not, what is your alternative explanation? Seems darn
near impossible to fulfill those postulates without the organism causing
disease!
-- hillary israeli vmd http://www.hillary.net info@hillary.net "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est." not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large :)
- Next message: Leonid Gavrilov: "New "Engineered Negligible Senescence" book"
- Previous message: Hillary Israeli: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- In reply to: P Harris: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- Next in thread: P Harris: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- Reply: P Harris: "Re: Clamping baby's cord - is baby still breathing through it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|