Re: Body Temperature
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/30/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Body Temperature"
- Previous message: Andrew Heenan: "Re: Needles. Syringes. Don, meet Tommy the anti-ferrous."
- Maybe in reply to: bae_at_cs.toronto.no-uce.edu.yyz: "Re: Body Temperature"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Body Temperature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:54:24 +0200
tech27 writes:
>
> "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ntd4e0pa2ae0u17o8l8etie89j3hee96pj@4ax.com...
> > Carey Gregory writes:
> >
> > > Thought #1- During the vast majority of human evolution, life spans
> weren't
> > > several times longer.
> >
> > Not true. Human beings have always had extremely long lifespans
> > compared to other animals. In the absence of disease, they routinely
> > live for six or seven decades or longer, and this has been true since
> > time immemorial.
> >
> > --
> > Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
>
> Not entirely correct. Human lifespans (actuarial vs some "potential"
> measurement), have been steadily rising over time. Although humans from way
> way back may have had the physical potential to live as long as they do now,
> in the real world they rarely did.
>
>
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Body Temperature"
- Previous message: Andrew Heenan: "Re: Needles. Syringes. Don, meet Tommy the anti-ferrous."
- Maybe in reply to: bae_at_cs.toronto.no-uce.edu.yyz: "Re: Body Temperature"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Body Temperature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
