EMT umbilical cord care? (also: Jeff P.Utz, MD no longer licensed)

From: Todd Gastaldo (tgastaldo_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 08/10/04 

Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:12:54 GMT

EMT UMBILICAL CORD CARE?

See below...

JEFF P.UTZ, MD no longer licensed...

"I no longer practice medicine. So I am no longer licensed."
--Jeff Utz, MD
(aka Jeffrey Peter, M.D. <drkid@my-deja.com>)
11/07/2000
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl905902570d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=8u91dl%24d50%241%40nnrp1.deja.com

Interspersions #####

"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i5gih05u42nbkfe3r4ni2jsgcn8h8ao44i@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:36:24 GMT, "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-August 10,
> 2004" <M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t 08-10-04@lambercartel.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Carey Gregory" <tiredofspam123@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >news:d08ih0le7tmqmsl38pqbch521ra42edmua@4ax.com...
> >> "Coleah" <coleah@pacifier.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >What is your purpose?
> >>
> >> Retaliation. Utz has shown her for the fool she is so this is just
> >Ilena's
> >> retaliatory reply. I've had her killfiled for a long time, something I
> >> highly recommend.
> >>
> >> Frankly, no doctor in his right mind would post here under his real
name,
> >> and never in a million years would he post actual credentials. The
fact
> >> that Utz does use his real name makes me question his sanity somewhat,
but
> >> otherwise his posts have always been sound and knowledgeable.
> >

##### Carey, aren't you an EMT and/or paramedic? Do EMTs/Paramedics still
leave the umbilical cord alone?

##### Canadian Grandma Donna Young recently sent me the following:

Reproduced from the Copyright First Edition of the Joint First Aid Manual
published in Great Britain by The St. John Ambulance Association of the
Order of St. John The St. Andrew's Ambulance Association of the Order of St.
John The St. Andrew's Ambulance Association and The British Red Cross
Society

First Canadian Edition
Six Impressions --1959-1963-- 410,000

Second Canadian Edition
First Impression -- 1964--75,000

This book is also printed in French

Printed in Canada by
The Runge Press Ltd., Ottawa, Ont.

"Care should be taken not to pull on the umbilical cord which still attaches
the baby to the mother. Handle it as little as possible. The cord and
after birth (placenta) are expelled usually within twenty minutes. It
should not be allowed to drop into soiled space but wrapped with the baby.
"Do NOT CUT the cord as there is danger of infection from unclean scissors
and the baby may bleed to death if cord is improperly tied.
    There is no cause for alarm if afterbirth is not expelled for several
hours. Mother and baby can be transported with the baby securely wrapped on
the mother's abdomen. "

##### My thanks BTW to Kelly (and little Bella) (and before that, Canadian
Grandma
Donna Young) for calling my attention to the fact that "Immediate clamping
of the umbilical cord can reduce the red blood cells an infant receives at
birth by more than 50%..."
--Mercer JS. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2001 Nov-Dec;46(6):402-14.
PubMed abstract (via Larry McMahan)

PREGNANT WOMEN: Why not let your BABY decide how much blood s/he needs?

By immediately clamping cords, OBs are robbing babies of *massive* amounts
of blood thanks in part to stem cell research...

It's mass immunologic child abuse....

Immediate cord clamping = robbery of hemopoietic stem cells "vital for
haematologic and immunologic constitution" [Wardrop and Holland J Perinat
Med. 1995;23(1-2):139-43. PubMed abstract]

See Stem cells are precious! Let your baby have first crack at them...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2706

> >Carey, I found his license in less than two minutes.
> >
> >It was far from difficult.
> >
> >Jeff corrected me earlier when i said that the fact that his webpage was
> >hosted by MSU was proof of validity. He pointed out that my conclusion
was
> >wrong, even though some people would take that as against his
credibility.
> >
> >The fact is simple: He has an MD degree, and is entitled to call himself
> >doctor. Others do not have this degree, and cannot do so. Further, the
fact
> >that he has tghis degree bespeaks of his education and intelligence.
>
>
> Still no evidence that he has a medical license ... nor is any
> evidence that he is a Pediatrician ...as he and Barrett claim he is
> ...

Ilena,

Assuming Jeff P.Utz has an MD degree (I think he does), he may still be
unlicensed - like me...

Unlike me though, Jeff P.Utz, MD is doing nothing to stop mass child abuse
by his fellow MDs....

Christopher B. Ish, MD also goes along with the grisly medical gags...

See below...

Jeff P. Utz, MD (kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com)...asked:

"Todd, what do you do for a living?..."
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=EC072A4CE4D1D698.703
1A0AECD70DD5A.6BC98586C880B633%40lp.airnews.net

I publicize the fact that LICENSED
"professionals" - MDs - are committing MASSIVE crimes against mothers and
babies as they FRAUDULENTLY make their livings fraudulently draining the
healthcare system of
BILLIONS - as mothers and babies suffer and sometimes die...

I publicize the fact that substantially MD-funded law enforcement officials
(attorney generals) are failing to take action to PROTECT mothers and
babies...

See Will 'The People' please help the TINIEST people? (Attn Oregon Atty Genl
Hardy Meyers)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=2zN1a.9095%24tO2.877
197%40newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net

Jeff, NO one needs a license to live and work on stopping MDs from harming
mothers and babies....

I mention this just in case you no longer have a license...

>>>>>BEGIN excerpt of Atty Haley: MDs put professional health above public
health (so do DCs)...
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=GobW5.758%246a.11728
2%40paloalto-snr1.gtei.net

...Jeffrey Peter Utz, MD
goes by a pseudonym, calling himself Jeffrey Peter, MD.

It was like pulling teeth, but Ilena Rosenthal finally wheedled this
admission out of him...

"I no longer practice medicine. So I am no longer licensed." --Jeff Utz, MD
(Jeffrey Peter, M.D. <drkid@my-deja.com>)
11/07/2000
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl905902570d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=8u91dl%24d50%241%40nnrp1.deja.com

Ilena [asked]...

"[S]o, where was [Jeffrey Peter Utz, MD] licensed, why did he give it up,
and why does he refuse to answer these questions ? ?"
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=692456897'

[Jeff, did you ever answer these questions?]

I've speculated that Dr. Utz posts from Pennsylvania...

See again: The meaning of 'putz'/Is Mayo Clinic James P. Utz, MD Jeffrey's
dad?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=Oh4Q5.8320%24JJ4.418
655%40paloalto-snr1.gtei.net

[Feb. 10, 2003 UPDATE: Jeff P.Utz, MD replied to "The meaning of 'putz'"
saying, "I am in no way related to James P. Utz, M.D."]
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=8urep8%24tfi%241%40n
nrp1.deja.com

>>>>>END excerpt of...
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=zz92a.10947%24tO2.1066582%40newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net&output=gplain

Christopher B. Ish, MD offers further humorous ad hominem but remains silent
about mass (sometimes fatal) MD-inflicted child abuse and other MD-inflicted
birth-related crimes.

"CBI" <00_doc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:22hQc.11388$Jp6.2985@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Todd Gastaldo wrote:
> > Christopher B. Ish, MD offered ad hominem...
> >
> > "Geeze - look what crawled out of the woodwork!...Off the
> meds or did
> > they finally let you out?"
>
> You didn't answer the question.
>

Eventually, the MD ad hominem attacks will stop - and so will the MD
crimes...

Or maybe I'm too optimistic.

For those who are interested...here's the info Chris Ish is attempting to
trivialize with ad hominem.

"What a terrible indictment...guilty of failing those for whom we have
chosen to be advocates." [Finkel KC: The failure to report child abuse.
AJDC, 1986;140:329-330]

Pediatricians are not only failing to protect babies...

Pediatricians are ripping and slicing babies...and remaining silent as OBs
do the same and worse to babies...

Pediatrician Jeff P.Utz, MD <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cef0q0$ctu@library1.airnews.net...

>
> Do you have evidence that people listened to you? Perhaps, you can show
the
> articles from these organizations that you say changed your views were
they
> cite you as one of the reasons they changed.
>

###### It's possible that the CMA ignored its own Scientific Board and
instantly created "an effective public health measure" out of "no medical
indications" routine infant circumcision because someone ELSE had just
exposed the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and called for an end
to the mass child abuse that is American medicine's most frequent surgical
behavior toward males.

See again: Chiro care of baby penises (also: Dr. Poland never sued Dr.
Gastaldo)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2430

> BTW, I couldn't help notice how you deletd this text of mine:
>
> "My my, someone has a swelled head.
>
> Mr. Gastablo's rant and raves deleted."
>
> without indicating that fact.That's intellectually dishonest.
>

###### Yes Jeff, I should have pointed out that your calling my arguments
"rant[s] and raves" without offering substantive criticism was
intellectually dishonest. Instead, I simply deleted your intellectual
dishonesty. Sorry.

> BTW, the AAP now recommends that analegesia be used during circumcism:
>
http://www.medem.com/medlb/article_detaillb_for_printer.cfm?article_ID=ZZZ13FOPIUC&sub_cat=1.

##### Using analgesia to accomplish child abuse is still child abuse.

"[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an acknowledged
hazard to health." [Michael Katz, MD: Letter. AJDC, 1980]

"What a terrible indictment...guilty of failing those for whom we have
chosen to be advocates." [Finkel KC: The failure to report child abuse.
AJDC, 1986;140:329-330]

>
> I beleive that [AAP has] been recommending [analgesia] for years.
>

###### Ah, medical progress - AAP recommending injecting penises with
anesthetic instead of simply recommending stopping mass MD ripping and
slicing of infant penises.

###### THINK ABOUT IT

###### AS INFANTS SCREAM AND WRITHE AND BLEED...

"One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is sliced
off." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (paraphrasing Ronald Goldman,
PhD,
author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)

"The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into
about 12 square inches of sexually sensitive skin."
http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (quoting Ronald Goldman, PhD, author of
Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)

###### PARENTS: IF YOU MUST HAVE YOUR SON'S FORESKIN AMPUTATED...

###### I think it is good that AAP now recognizes that babies can feel pain
and recommends analgesia.

###### According to the medical literature, Mogen clamp and dorsal penile
nerve
block (DPNB) injections are best - with "ring block" being an anesthesia
alternative - but talk to whomever will rip and slice your son's penis.

###### Thanks for reading.

###### Sincerely,

###### Todd

###### Dr. Gastaldo (todd@chiromotion.com)

###### PS If I could have MDs stop only ONE of their massive crimes against
babies, it would be the crime of closing birth canals up to 30%.

For simple PROOF that OBs are knowingly closing birth canals up to
30%...

For simple instructions on how women can allow their
birth canals to OPEN their birth canals the "extra" up to 30%...

See I ain't no Semmelweis, but...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2591

IT'S OBVIOUS OB CRIME...

OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring everything possible is being done to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

OBs are slicing abdomens en masse ("c-section") - surgically/fraudulently
inferring everything possible has been DONE to open birth canals - even as
they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

Now - to be sure - allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% is
not going to prevent all caesareans and episiotomies - but it can't hurt.

Incidentally, when babies' shoulders get stuck, OBs KEEP the birth canal
closed - even as they say they are opening it maximally.

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2300

OBs don't charge for their mass vagina slicing - but it is known
to increase severe perineal tears by 50X - and perineal tearing is the most
common reason for hospitalization of women:

"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma to
perineum due to childbirth."
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm

See also: Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of Medicine

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2256

TRANSLATION: Hospitalization of women BEFORE childbirth is the most common
reason for hospital admission AFTER childbirth!

It is sordidly hilarious to see Jeff P.Utz, MD demand EVIDENCE for this or
that as his specialty pediatrics IGNORES obvious mass obstetric crime
against babies and itself commits obvious mass child abuse - still behaving
as if babies can't feel pain.

Most bizarre.

The problem of course is that medical science isn't.

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
todd@chiromotion.com

HOPE ON THE HORIZON?

AN OB INFORMED CONSENT FORM THAT ACTUALLY **INFORMS**?

See Forced fetal fluoridation (also: An OB informed consent form that
INFORMS!)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2719

Relevant Pages
Quantcast