Re: Are AM Radio Waves Harmful?
From: Robert Morrisette (writer77_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 08/17/04
- Next message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Muslim doctors refuse to treat sinful patients"
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: BHARAT - WORLD'S R&D HOT SPOT"
- In reply to: B. Raleigh: "Are AM Radio Waves Harmful?"
- Next in thread: Oren: "Re: Are AM Radio Waves Harmful?"
- Reply: Oren: "Re: Are AM Radio Waves Harmful?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:36:37 GMT
This is total bunk.
"B. Raleigh" <raleigh@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:41218651.34D3A196@nospam.com...
> By Stephen Leahy
> Aug. 16, 2004
>
> Korean scientists have found that regions near AM radio-broadcasting
> towers
> had 70 percent more leukemia deaths than those without.
>
> The study, to be published in an upcoming issue of the International
> Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, also found that
> cancer
> deaths were 29 percent higher near such transmitters.
> .
> Two years ago an Italian study found death rates from leukemia increased
> dramatically for residents living within two miles of Vatican Radio's
> powerful array of transmitters in Rome.
>
> The Koreans looked at the death rates in 10 regions with AM
> radio-transmitting towers broadcasting at more than 100 kilowatts and
> compared them with control areas without transmitters. The substantially
> higher cancer mortality in those who lived within two kilometers of the
> towers led researchers to conclude that more investigation was needed.
>
> However, they also said their study did not prove a direct link between
> cancer and the transmitters.
>
> "There have been many studies like these, and they aren't very
> convincing,"
> said Mary McBride, an epidemiologist at the British Columbia Cancer
> Agency.
> Many other factors could have contributed to those cancer rates, said
> McBride, who has headed a number of similar studies and found no direct
> link.
>
> Equally important is that studies in the lab don't show how radio waves
> can
> produce cancers, she said.
> Debate continues over the health effects of radio waves from
> transmitters,
> both large and small, and other forms of electromagnetic fields,
> including
> power lines and microwaves.
>
> Sam Milham, a Seattle-based epidemiologist and a pioneer in
> electromagnetic-field research, is convinced there are health effects.
> "Lots
> of research papers from around the world show increased cancers near
> transmitters, although TV and FM transmitters are more often
> implicated."
>
> Moreover, many lab studies show low-frequency EMF disrupt living cells,
> Milham asserts. Critics like McBride say such results are often
> difficult to
> reproduce at other labs. Milham says that's because of differences in
> the
> Earth's magnetic field and stray EMF.
>
> In an attempt to settle some of this, California's Department of Health
> Services reviewed all the current studies of EMF risks from power lines,
> wiring and appliances in 2002. It found no conclusive evidence of harm.
> However, links to childhood leukemia, adult brain cancer and Lou
> Gehrig's
> disease could not be ruled out.
>
> "I'm convinced that politics and corporate interests are behind denials
> (that say) there are no health effects," said Milham.
>
> Meanwhile, the FDA and the World Health Organization are urging more
> studies, especially of radio waves from cell phones.
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,64579,00.html?tw=rss.TOP
>
> (See also related stories at the website).
- Next message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Muslim doctors refuse to treat sinful patients"
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: BHARAT - WORLD'S R&D HOT SPOT"
- In reply to: B. Raleigh: "Are AM Radio Waves Harmful?"
- Next in thread: Oren: "Re: Are AM Radio Waves Harmful?"
- Reply: Oren: "Re: Are AM Radio Waves Harmful?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|