Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade
From: Bob (this one) (Bob_at_nospam.com)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: Bob (this one): "Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The BullshitParade"
- Previous message: Bob (this one): "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- In reply to: Steve Marcus: "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- Next in thread: Steve Marcus: "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- Reply: Steve Marcus: "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:29:22 -0400
Steve wrote:
>I'll top post to note that you have edit my post (both some of what
I >wrote and some of what you wrote, thereby destroying the context.
See, I think you top posted as an effort to avoid the embarrassment of
having been dealt with logically and fully. In this post, you cut off
all the information and proclaim some sort of victory. <LOL>
Time-tested method of failed efforts.
>The gentle readers who may be interested will have to dredge up my
>post in order to read what you had written and what I wrote in reply.
Not at all, Steve. As a public service, I've put the URL here so they
don't need to do the looking. Just a courtesy. whole thread at:
<http://tinyurl.com/4qvsf>
And I love that "gentle readers" business. Courtly and only slightly
pedantic. Only slightly pompous.
>The fact that you had to do that editing in order appear justified
in >spewing your crap below shows a couple of things:
Editing was essentially a reduction in your bluster and points not
germane to the discourse.
>1. My position is far closer to being accurate than your position.
<LOL> I bet Chung's saying that 2 pounds is *the only determinant* in
his diet must have distressed you. Oh, wait. Then he said that *what*
you eat matters, too. That would be the part where calories matter.
See how wonderfully he has his calories and eats them, too?
Contradicts himself and then claims others don't understand him. And
you build on his shaky foundation to arrive at a splendidly
synthesized porridge of untruths and half-truths to preach 2PD when
it's all on the web site in full-dress weaselry for everyone to laugh at.
Here's a direct, unedited exchange between Chung and me:
Bob writes:
>> If some foods can't be eaten and still be within the guidelines,
>> then there's another variable at hand.
Chung replies:
> Correct. For this reason, the 2PD Approach guidelines limit amount
> of food and nothing else.
Got that, Bunky? "Amount of food and nothing else." Period. Words from
the Grand Poobah of 2Poundery, himself. Keep in touch, huh?
>2. And you know it.
<LOL> More of your clairvoyance. Just like your understanding of
Chunglish. Well, don't think this hasn't been fun, Steve. I like
having so many slow ones right down the middle. Easier to hit out of
the park this way.
>Have a nice day, Bobbie boy.
Always, Steve. Always...
Bob
- Next message: Bob (this one): "Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The BullshitParade"
- Previous message: Bob (this one): "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- In reply to: Steve Marcus: "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- Next in thread: Steve Marcus: "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- Reply: Steve Marcus: "Re: Here, Steve... WAS:Re: Chung has died and returned with proof WAS:Re: The Bull*** Parade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]