Re: Just to let you know Mark was all clear Andrew...

From: SomeGuy (spam_at_spam.sp)
Date: 08/27/04


Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:49:44 GMT


"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote
>
> May all who have eyes, read.

May all who can read, comprehend!

"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote

> SomeGuy wrote
>
> > Would suggest you read the article. The puppies with retinal
> > degeneration were not born blind. They did have early vision loss:
> >
> > "Puppies and human infant with defective RPE65 genes
> > produce a mutant form of the RPE65 protein,
> > resulting in early vision loss, degeneration of the
> > retinas and near-total blindness later in life."
>
> Andrew, Andrew, Andrew ... you dissapoint me. Not only
> did I read the article, I actually read the WHOLE article. :-)
>
> "They injected the combination into the subretinal space of
> the eyes of 3-month-old briard-beagle mix dogs that were
> known to have the defective RPE65 gene and had been blind .
> since birth
>
> "Within six weeks, the treated eyes were producing the correct
> form of RPE65 protein. By three months, a series of tests
> (electroretinography, pupillometry and obstacle-avoidance
> tests in a dimly lit room) demonstrated that vision was restored
> to the treated eyes.
>
>
>
> Those two paragraphs were only one paragraph away from
> the one you quoted! Allow me to point out the important
> statement so you don't miss it "... and had been blind since
> birth." That means "born blind," Andrew, "born blind."
> Were you lying when you wrote "The puppies with
> retinal degeneration were not born blind"?
>
> > It seems that the author who wrote the article unconsciously
> > wished we had Christ's power to heal. We do tend to
> > covet wondrous things that do not belong to us.
>
> And the author to whom I am responding now seems to
> unconciously wish he had the power to comprehend printed words. :-)
>
> > Truth is simple.
>
> ... but only for some:
>
> Andrew: "The puppies with retinal degeneration were not born blind"
>
> Article: "3-month-old briard-beagle mix dogs that were known
> to have the defective RPE65 gene and had been blind since birth."



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just to let you know Mark was all clear Andrew...
    ... > May all who have eyes, ... > Andrew, Andrew, Andrew ... ... > Those two paragraphs were only one paragraph away from ... > retinal degeneration were not born blind"? ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: How to Become a Christian, Version 1.01
    ... >> you're not one of them, Andrew. ... > Those two paragraphs were only one paragraph away from ... > retinal degeneration were not born blind"? ... > to have the defective RPE65 gene and had been blind since birth." ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: How to Become a Christian, Version 1.01
    ... >> you're not one of them, Andrew. ... > Those two paragraphs were only one paragraph away from ... > retinal degeneration were not born blind"? ... > to have the defective RPE65 gene and had been blind since birth." ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Chung is a liar! (was Re: Just to let you ...)
    ... >> Andrew, did you, or did you not, make two posts within the same second? ... > Those two paragraphs were only one paragraph away from ... > retinal degeneration were not born blind"? ... > to have the defective RPE65 gene and had been blind since birth." ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Chung is a liar! (was Re: Just to let you ...)
    ... >> Andrew, did you, or did you not, make two posts within the same second? ... > Those two paragraphs were only one paragraph away from ... > retinal degeneration were not born blind"? ... > to have the defective RPE65 gene and had been blind since birth." ...
    (sci.med)