Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US
From: GMCarter (fiar_at_verizon.net)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: SomeGuy: "Re: OT - Brain Scans Show That Buddhists Really Are Happier!"
- Previous message: Martin W. Smith: "Re: This just in: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD is untruthful!"
- Next in thread: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Reply: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Founding Father: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Founding Father: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Keith F. Lynch: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:17:48 GMT
On 30 Aug 2004 12:45:51 -0700, sbharris@ix.netcom.com (Steve Harris
sbharris@ROMAN9.netcom.com) wrote:
snip
>COMMENT:
>
>George, you just wasted a whole post with off-topic comments about
>global warming. If you think some site is "right wing" and you don't
>think the "right wing" is right about global warming, then THEREFORE
>you think this gives you carte blanche to simply ignore all opinions
>you find there as propaganda? Say what?
In the case of these extreme right wing sites that make up crap, twist
and shout to make a case based on nonsense (sorta like Iraq), you
better believe I completely mistrust them.
>If I find some medical-economic information on a site that seems "left
>wing," and I think the "left wing" is out to lunch about the value of
>nuclear energy (except of course in France), does that mean I can
>safely disregard their medico-economic opinions also?
If you wish. Some left wing sites are probably a LOT less reliable and
I'd be less inclined to believe them--if they espoused a lot of
conspiracy theories for example.
>Look, I've read that the French spend more per capita than the US does
>on pharmaceuticals, now, from many sources. I just gave you the most
>conventient one I came across in a google search. If you disagree,
>don't just express skepticism, post a source of your own that claims
>the opposite. I doubt you can find one, but have at it. I think this
>"factoid" is true. It doesn't matter if you're left or right, this is
>basic data. Interpret it however you like.
Now, Steve!! You may be right but it is incumbent upon you to be the
one to provide the source--if you have time and/or come across another
source that isn't from the extreme right, pass it along. I'm a little
crazed for work or I'd look for it. (Anyway, your site was about
Japan, not France.) It may just be a lie that people like the Fraser
Institute spread and other right wing extremists pick up and run with.
George M. Carter
- Next message: SomeGuy: "Re: OT - Brain Scans Show That Buddhists Really Are Happier!"
- Previous message: Martin W. Smith: "Re: This just in: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD is untruthful!"
- Next in thread: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Reply: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Founding Father: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Founding Father: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Maybe reply: Keith F. Lynch: "Re: Canadian doctors coming to the US"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|