Re: clinton surgery question

From: Happy Dog (happydog_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 09/25/04 

Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:08:35 -0400

"MU" <munospam@fastmail.fm> wrote>> Grade one, maybe. Idiot Mu. You
claimed that you know what doesn't happen
>> in the afterlife WRT reqard and punishment. You claim to know this
>> through
>> god's teachings etc.
>
> I claim to know that I learned that I do not know? Nope, never said that
> Unhappy TrollPuppy.

You said that reward and punishment are not meted out in the afterlife. (I
said this was an assumption and you said it was incorrect.)
>
>> Then you claim that you have no real knowledge or any
>> need for it. And you also claim to be a skeptic. This is patently
>> hallucinatory.
>
> Maybe to you. Makes perfect sense and works quite well for me. One can be
> skeptical without the need to know; you confuse "desire to know" with need
> to know. I desire to know, and will, someday but I have no need to know
> until then. God's Plan.

A skeptic who doesn't need to ask questions? How cute.
>
>>>>You claim to be a skeptic but
>>>> feel that "God's teachings" are axiomatic.
>>>
>>> I never said that. You made that up out of thin air.
>
>> Nope. You can't explain how god's teachings are transmitted and how you
>> arrive at a particular viewpoint when most of the rest of the world has a
>> different one.
>
> Sure I can. As to what the rest of the world knows is of little concern to
> me.

So much for skepticism. Anyone with a skeptical bone would ask why
Christian adherents are in the minority. But you just don't care to know.
>
>> All that adds up to a POV which requires god's teachings to
>> be self-evident to any right-thinking individual. Like you, no?
>
> God lets me know what He feels I need to know. Faith not right thinking
> opens that channel of knowledge.

OK. Self evident to any faithful person. So why do people of different
faiths get different messages? How do you know that yours is true?

>>>>So when I ask you to show us, in
>>>> detail, exactly what the no-*** teachings are that eclipse all the
>>>> other
>>>> no-*** teachings of other gods, you'll put it in a succint and
>>>> credible
>>>> form. Not.
>>>
>>> You never asked me for any such detail. Drink less when you post.
>>
>> "When I ask you" is in the present. The question is implied.
>
> I don't know what a "no ***" teaching is. Try again. No ***, please do.

Yes you do mu mu. It's the real version of universal reality that the
faithful, oops, Christian faithful, understand. But, like I said, can't
explain in a rational way to skeptics or non-believers. Just like the other
faithful...

>>> See above regarding drinking.
>>
>> Gee MU, you've really seized on this particular insult. Projecting
>> perhaps?
>
> Projecting what? You post like you are imbibed, that's all.

Occasionally. Better than drunk on Jesus.

le mo