Re: clinton surgery question

From: MU (munospam_at_fastmail.fm)
Date: 09/26/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:14:33 -0400

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:08:35 -0400, Happy Dog wrote:

> You said that reward and punishment are not meted out in the afterlife. (I
> said this was an assumption and you said it was incorrect.)

Never said that.

>> One can be
>> skeptical without the need to know; you confuse "desire to know" with need
>> to know. I desire to know, and will, someday but I have no need to know
>> until then. God's Plan.

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:08:35 -0400, Happy Dog wrote:

> A skeptic who doesn't need to ask questions? How cute.

I ask questions. Read more carefully.

> So much for skepticism. Anyone with a skeptical bone would ask why
> Christian adherents are in the minority. But you just don't care to know.

Correct. Lemmings running off cliffs are in the majority at that time. A
better question is why is it that you find the need to be in the majority
to be right?

>> God lets me know what He feels I need to know. Faith not right thinking
>> opens that channel of knowledge.

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:08:35 -0400, Happy Dog wrote:
 
> So why do people of different
> faiths get different messages? How do you know that yours is true?

Satan has his hand in this world for one. I know mine is true because God
has been kind enough to reaffirm me with increasing amounts of faith and
comfort in His Plan.

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:08:35 -0400, Happy Dog wrote:
 
>>>>>So when I ask you to show us, in
>>>>> detail, exactly what the no-*** teachings are that eclipse all the
>>>>> other
>>>>> no-*** teachings of other gods, you'll put it in a succint and
>>>>> credible
>>>>> form. Not.

>> I don't know what a "no ***" teaching is. Try again. No ***, please do.

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:08:35 -0400, Happy Dog wrote:
 
> Yes you do mu mu. It's the real version of universal reality that the
> faithful, oops, Christian faithful, understand. But, like I said, can't
> explain in a rational way to skeptics or non-believers.

Difficult to explain something to someone who hasn't the tools to
understand. And you won't get those tools from God until you ask for them.
 
>>>> See above regarding drinking.
>>>
>>> Gee MU, you've really seized on this particular insult. Projecting
>>> perhaps?
>>
>> Projecting what? You post like you are imbibed, that's all.

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:08:35 -0400, Happy Dog wrote:
 
> Occasionally. Better than drunk on Jesus.

How would you know?