Re: Michael Underwood = MU
From: Carey Gregory (tiredofspam123_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Julie Bove: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Previous message: MU: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- In reply to: Bob (this one): "Michael Underwood = MU"
- Next in thread: listener: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: listener: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: Eva: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: Bob (this one): "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: MU: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:21:33 -0400
"Bob (this one)" <Bob@nospam.com> wrote:
>Here's a theory to play with. I think MU is a guy named Michael
>Underwood who posted hereabouts some time back and is now using his
>initials.
Sorry, but the evidence doesn't fit. The only Michael Underwood I can find
who posted to SMC (up until 1999) appears totally legit and in no way
connected to Chung or Mu.
Why look for a real person behind the Mu character when all the evidence
points to Mu merely being Chung's sock puppet? It's the only explanation
that fits all the facts. That's especially true in older posts before
Chung/Mu got smart and switched to news providers that conceal identifying
header information.
- Next message: Julie Bove: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Previous message: MU: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- In reply to: Bob (this one): "Michael Underwood = MU"
- Next in thread: listener: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: listener: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: Eva: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: Bob (this one): "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Reply: MU: "Re: Michael Underwood = MU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|