Re: Blatant CDC lie (pharma shill)
From: Carey Gregory (tiredofspam123_at_comcast.net)
Date: 10/19/04
- Next message: Bob (this one): "Re: How to Become a Christian, Version 1.01"
- Previous message: Todd Gastaldo: "FluMist was HYPING VACCINES: AN INVESTIGATION"
- In reply to: Byron Canfield: "Re: Blatant CDC lie (pharma shill)"
- Next in thread: Byron Canfield: "Re: Blatant CDC lie (pharma shill)"
- Reply: Byron Canfield: "Re: Blatant CDC lie (pharma shill)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:13:28 -0400
"Byron Canfield" <barnNOSPAM@NOSPAMbyronc.com> wrote:
>That's what I said -- the "facts" as bandied about by the CDC are wrong as a
>result of failure to follow principles of logic (in restricting causality)
>to serve an agenda of engendering fear. And the cited link, cited, I might
>remind you, by SUPPORTERS of the CDCs position, show that very thing.
The facts appear to be correct and the CDC did not fail to follow principles
of logic. From the critique you offered, it seems apparent you don't know
how to interpret the article. Your attempt to make hay out of the term
"influenza-related" is a shining example.
- Next message: Bob (this one): "Re: How to Become a Christian, Version 1.01"
- Previous message: Todd Gastaldo: "FluMist was HYPING VACCINES: AN INVESTIGATION"
- In reply to: Byron Canfield: "Re: Blatant CDC lie (pharma shill)"
- Next in thread: Byron Canfield: "Re: Blatant CDC lie (pharma shill)"
- Reply: Byron Canfield: "Re: Blatant CDC lie (pharma shill)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]