Breastfeeding someone else's child (and other immunological acts)
From: Todd Gastaldo (tgastaldo_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: ren: "Re: What makes women great"
- Previous message: Day Brown: "Re: What makes women great"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:02:51 GMT
WET NURSE (parents request it; fathers were responsible in Islam)
"...In early Islam it was a father's obligation to ensure that his child
received human milk, if the biological mother was indisposed to provide it.
Securing human milk was of vital importance for the survival of the child.
The historical solution was to employ a wet nurse. Paying a good salary to
wet nurses and giving them a status similar to that of a biological mother
was a precaution for securing that babies received sufficient milk..."
Kocturk T^^^. Acta Paediatr. 2003 May;92(5):617-20. PubMed abstract
^^^Copied to Dr. Kocturk via Department of Family Medicine, Karolinska
Institute, Center for Migration Medicine, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
tahire.kocturk@klinvet.ki.se
"OUTRAGING PUBLIC DECENCY AND PUBLIC MORALS"
DAYCARE OWNER BREASTFEEDS (without parents' knowledge)
Daycare owner charged with breast-feeding someone else's baby
Tuesday, June 3, 2003
(06-03) 09:52 PDT STIGLER, Okla. (AP) --
A woman was charged with breast-feeding someone else's baby at a daycare
center without the parents' knowledge.
Prosecutors charged Shannon Denney, 32, with outraging public decency and
public morals, punishable by up to a year in jail and a $500 fine.
Denney, whose own child attended the daycare center, apparently decided to
help out one day in late November or early December by breast-feeding a
3-month-old girl, authorities said.
"The baby was crying and they were feeding it a bottle and that didn't stop
it," prosecutor Ron Boyer said.
The mother found out months later when a rumor circulated around the town of
2,500, he said.
"It got back to the mother," Boyer said. "The mother confronted the woman
and asked her about it and she admitted that it happened."
After the alleged incident, Denney bought the daycare center, but she has
since closed it. She did not immediately return a call Tuesday.
The state Department of Human Services, which licenses daycare centers, has
no policy on breast-feeding someone else's child.
"It's a common sense sort of thing," department spokesman George Johnson
said. "It's something that today you don't even think about."
Viruses can be transmitted through breast milk.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/a/2003/06/03/national1252EDT0599.DTL
"THE ICK FACTOR"
Someone remarked...
"I'm not even talking about germs and such. I'm talking about ick factor.
The whole thing kind of creeps me out...Yes, I know people used to do this.
I'm aware."
http://www.groovy-mom.com/groovy/old/000269.html
My bet is that some breastfeeding women breastfeed each other's babies and
don't say anything about it.
The formula industry can literally BANK on "the ick factor" - which includes
public brow-beating of breastfeeding women for breastfeeding their own
children...
MAKING "THE ICK FACTOR" WORSE...
How very odd that MDs aren't telling the world public that breastfeeding
women are IMMUNIZERS who reportedly make MD-needle-vaccinations work better.
What woman would fail to at least ATTEMPT to breastfeed (or offer bottled
breastmilk) after being informed that pregnant women scan for pathogens and
manufacture IMMUNIZATIONS in their breastmilk?
What woman would fail to at least attempt it after being informed that
breastfed babies get free DAILY immunizations that reportedly make
MD-needle-vaccinations work better?
MD trade unions are silently ignoring a simple way to make the immunization
rate skyrocket.
MD trade unions are lying by omission thereby denying massive numbers of
babies massive numbers of free daily immunizations.
MDs are mostly anti-immunization.
On top of this...
MDs fraudulently promote their
vaccines as being 100% effective - saying that during disease outbreaks they
will keep all vaccinated children in school and only send home/protect
vaccine exempt children. ALL children should go home/be protected during
disease outbreaks because some children (no one knows who they are) are not
immunized by their vaccinations. Vaccination is ATTEMPTED immunization.
Vaccines are not 100% effective.
It bears repeating...
MD trade unions are silently ignoring a simple way to make the immunization
rate skyrocket.
MD trade unions are lying by omission thereby denying massive numbers of
babies massive numbers of free daily immunizations.
I would say that VERY FEW women would fail to at least attempt to breastfeed
after being informed that
breastfed babies get free DAILY immunizations that reportedly make
MD-needle-vaccinations work better...
MD trade unions are also silent as OBs close birth canals up to 30% and keep
birth canals closed when babies get stuck - OBs place women semisitting or
dorsal as they pull with forceps and vacuums...
It may still be possible to purchase ACOG's video of this obvious felony in
cases of shoulder dystocia. (OBs are admitting they usually close the birth
canal by purporting to show OBs how to allow the birth canal to open
maximally when shoulders get stuck. The problem is - the method they are
teaching keeps the birth canal closed.)
See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2300
Dr. Kocturk, if you are still reading: 1) please spread the word about
breastfeeding being free daily immunizations that reportedly make
MD-needle-vaccinations work better; and 2) please spread the word about OBs
closing birth canals up to 30%...
PREGNANT WOMEN: All you have to do to allow your birth canal to OPEN the
"extra" up to
30% is roll onto your side as you push your baby out. But beware: Some OBs
and CNMwives will let you "try" alternative delivery positions but will move
you back to semisitting/dorsal (close your birth canal) for the actual
delivery. And most OBs KEEP the birth canal closed when your baby gets
stuck. Talk to your OB or midwife about this in advance...
One last matter - more immunologic child abuse by OBs...
OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies to rob them of massive amounts of
blood to obtain powerful immunologic cells called stem cells.
Immediate cord clamping affects "EVERY CESAREAN SECTION BABY" according to
retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG who writes of this
obstetric insanity...
"[ACOG Practice Bulletin B138] was first published in 1993. Every cesarean
section baby, every
depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism."
This obvious felony of asphyxiating babies to "obtain cord blood pH studies"
by robbing them of massive amounts of blood - is the obstetric *standard of
care*!!!
Here is ACOG Practice Bulletin B138 (re-affirmed Feb 2002):
"...Immediately after delivery of the neonate, a segment of umbilical cord
should be doubly clamped, divided, and placed on the delivery table pending
assessment of the five minute Apgar score."
--1991 (re-affirmed Feb 2002) ACOG Committee opinion: Bulletin 138 - April
1994 (replaces #91, February 1991)
>From quotes compiled mainly by Eileen Simon from the Harvard Medical School
Libraryhttp://www.cordclamping.com/History.htm
Here is a fuller excerpt of Dr. Morley's writing:
"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock...
"B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every
depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism.
"For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm
George Morley, the retired OB quoted above - as valiant as he is - does not
want to see child protection laws used to stop the mass baby asphyxiation he
is exposing.
George and I disagree on this point...
Why would we NOT use laws designed to protect children - to protect
children?
See Babies gasping: Michigan sheriffs to do "child abuse raid" on hospitals?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2618
PREGNANT WOMEN: Do not let the OB or CNMwife clamp your baby's umbilical
cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink, breathing and not
in need of resuscitation... Talk to your OB or CNMwife about this today.
My thanks to Donna Young for alerting me to this mass OB child abuse scam -
and to Kelly Moscarello for bringing it back to my attention when little
Bella suffered cerebral palsy after a shoulder dystocia - and a dorsal birth
in an ambulance (?) and after having her cord immediately clamped by the
paramedic.
I hope paramedics are helping to stop OBs from temporarily asphyxiating
babies not to mention the other obvious OB felonies.
One last note: As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As
naive med students, MDs are TRAINED to perform these obvious felonies -
after which it is hard for them to publicly protest and admit the bizarre OB
behavior should end...
See NHS: Dr. Sarah disappoints - was Re: Question #2 for Dr. Sarah
Vaughan (should women have to ASK?)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2906
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
todd@chiromotion.com
- Next message: ren: "Re: What makes women great"
- Previous message: Day Brown: "Re: What makes women great"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
