Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?
From: John M Price PhD (jmprice_at_calweb.com)
Date: 11/16/04
- Next message: John M Price PhD: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Previous message: Kath: "Re: People in pain turn to cupping therapy"
- In reply to: Uiopp: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Next in thread: Uiopp: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Reply: Uiopp: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Nov 2004 02:20:27 GMT
In sci.skeptic article <SearchResult8FromUioppuislad-0CC275.16013315112004@lust.ihug.co.nz> Uiopp <SearchResult8FromUioppuislad@faaa.co.nz> wrote:
: In article <41978006$0$19041$d368eab@news.calweb.com>,
: John M Price PhD <jmprice@calweb.com> wrote:
: [snip]
: > : > : > > So, how do you explain why homosexual men tend to have close
: > : > : > > mothers
: > : > : > > and
: > : > : > > distant fathers? Freud was only seeing what was there to be seen.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > You are assuming something for which you have presented no evidence.
: > : > : > Document your assertion and produce statistical facts to back it up.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > Bob Kolker
: > : >
: > : > : Actually I did provide evidence. I directed Price to a recent article
: > : > : on
: > : > : sexual orientation on Simon LeVay's home page, where he admits this.
: > : >
: > : > Not that I read. Maybe you should read the whole paper.
: >
: > : Excuse me. The evidence in question was for the proposition that gay men
: > : tend to have close mothers and distant fathers. LeVay says they do. It
: > : is true he suggests a different possible explanation for this fact, but
: > : as a careful scientist, he leaves the matter open.
: >
: > Comment: These retrospective findings don't necessarily mean that
: > parental attitudes influence the child's sexual orientation in the way
: > Freud envisaged, however. A contemporary American analyst has
: > suggested that parental attitudes to pre-gay children, such as a
: > father's withdrawal or hostility, may actually be a response to
: > gender-variant traits in the child rather than a cause of them (Isay,
: > 1989, 1996).
: >
: > That is *not* support.
: You pathetic, wormy little liar. The only thing under discussion here
: was whether it was actually true that gay men tend to have close mothers
: and distant fathers. The only thing I said LeVay provided support for
: was the proposition that in fact they do - and indeed he did so.
: So, yes, actually, that is support.
The comment I inserted was LeVay's.
You need to read it with a dictionary at your side.
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
--
John M. Price, PhD jmprice@calweb.com
Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP!
Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion.
Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683
Yes, it is true that I cannot respond in a coherent manner on
Usenet.
- dotnet@webtv.net - 10/27/97
- Next message: John M Price PhD: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Previous message: Kath: "Re: People in pain turn to cupping therapy"
- In reply to: Uiopp: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Next in thread: Uiopp: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Reply: Uiopp: "Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|