Re: DRUGGISTS REFUSE TO GIVE OUT PILL

From: Alan Turley (arguilios_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/19/04

  • Next message: David Wright: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie" 
    Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:33:00 -0600

    On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:58:36 -0500, Carey Gregory wrote:

    >You've demonstrated your prowess in legal minutiae. Now, do you have any
    >thoughts on the subject at hand?

    Thoughts? Sure, though I'll have to take a rain check for the night.
    It's late, and I'm too tired to write anything particularly articulate
    this evening.

    Scrutinizing minutiae? Hardly. I've spoken in only the most general
    of terms in regard to a topic begging to grow into a law suit or five
    or more and a batch of new legislation and regulations.

    If you feel put upon by my comments, then I apologize. But, if you'd
    read my responses so thoroughly as you seem to think I've disregarded
    yours, you'd see that I've suggested several routes of more effective
    attack against those supplanting the physician's therapeutic judgment,
    intruding upon doctor-patient relationships, and exploiting positions
    of power over dispensation to advance a moralistic political interest
    that wouldn't survive scrutiny, if it survived legislation.

    Personally, I wouldn't encourage you to sit idly by. But, don't try
    to construe my conversational inquiries as legal advise. It isn't.

    But, a careful reader might parse out a rudimentary outline suitable
    for pasting up a legislative advocacy plan - if one were so inclined.

    @~

  • Next message: David Wright: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie"