Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie
From: David Wright (wright_at_clam.prodigy.net)
Date: 11/20/04
- Next message: David Wright: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie"
- Previous message: Rich: "Re: A SLOW-ONSET TETANUS VACCINE REACTION"
- In reply to: PF Riley: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie"
- Next in thread: PF Riley: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:19:00 GMT
In article <1p0rp05q791lsrbhcjuqdamjgnmk39nu8n@4ax.com>,
PF Riley <pfriley@watt-not.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 04:32:53 GMT, wright@clam.prodigy.net (David
>Wright) wrote:
>
>>In article <cnj2df$d0p$1@sparta.btinternet.com>,
>>john <nospamoridiots@vaccine.com> wrote:
>>>http://www.whale.to/vaccines/safer.html
>>
>>The usual rabid hysteria -- a lot of unverifiable quotations, and
>>nothing much in the way of hard fact. Typical.
>
>Its main premise is that if something can cause death or "numerous
>diseases" or brain damage then it is not safe.
>
>By that logic, then, eating is not safe.
>
>Does John eat?
I don't even want to think about what John eats. But your point is
well-taken, and is typical of the anti-vac loons. They focus entirely
on the possible adverse effects of vaccines and not at all on the
adverse effects of diseases. John travels an extra few blocks into
Loonville by basically denying that (a) vaccines ever work, and (b)
that diseases like measles are ever harmful.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
- Next message: David Wright: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie"
- Previous message: Rich: "Re: A SLOW-ONSET TETANUS VACCINE REACTION"
- In reply to: PF Riley: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie"
- Next in thread: PF Riley: "Re: The 'Safe' vaccine lie"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|