Re: Yet, another failure of the peer review process!
From: N-H-P (johngohde_at_naturalhealthperspective.com)
Date: 11/20/04
- Next message: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Phages may end need for antibiotics"
- Previous message: outrider_at_despammed.com: "JAMA: Bayer knew Baycol killed"
- In reply to: markd_at_toad-net.com: "Re: Yet, another failure of the peer review process!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Nov 2004 09:56:02 -0800
markd@toad-net.com wrote:
> This post is a good reflection of someone's knowledge
> of how science works, but who doesn't really care about science and seeks
> to use it as grist for some agenda mill; which in part is to spam for a
> blog it seems.
Thanks for being honest and for confirming your biases in the
world of ngs, by which we can only begin to scratch the
surface of your agenda mill.
It is a health blog, if it is all the same to you. :)
'The Toad' promotes his agenda mill by replying to posts. I
promote my agenda by creating new threads. See, 'Toad,'
we already share too much in common.
Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
-- john gohde http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/
- Next message: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Phages may end need for antibiotics"
- Previous message: outrider_at_despammed.com: "JAMA: Bayer knew Baycol killed"
- In reply to: markd_at_toad-net.com: "Re: Yet, another failure of the peer review process!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
