Re: Side effects: drugs called statins

From: Happy Dog (happydog_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 12/07/04 

Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 01:50:35 -0500

<awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> LOL! How much band width do you have?
>
>>Enough for you to post some real evidence. Which you won't
>
> You're right, I won't post what you THINK is 'real' evidence. I'm not
> limited by your narrow window of acceptance. There is more in this
> world than all your philosophies including your blind faith in the
> lyin-tific method,

Soooooo, I should accept your adorable anecdotes as evidence. As for
"faith", I have little. And, on that, anyone making this claim is an
expert. So, again, you don't know ***.

>
> I have cure myself many times of many different conditions. I have
> helped others do the same.

Liar, idoit. Pick one or noth.

> So I laugh when I see people like yourself who are still stuck in their
> belief systems.

The alternative is to believe your word. On Usenet. Right?
>
>>Correct. The evidence shows it isn't true. Anecdotal stories may say
>>otherwise. So what?
>
> It is the hallmark of the mediocre scientist to ignore a good anecdote.

Gee, can I quote you? You make this up on your own? Anecdote over
evidence? Not even interesting. The history of science is littered with
the memories of those who couldn't get over the fact that their beliefs were
contradicted by observation. Reality is not negotiable.

>>Correct. Flu doesn't resolve in twenty minutes.
>
> It does when you know what to do.

Sure. Rabies too, no doubt. But rabies is just another form of flu, no?
"'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean different
things'"

>>Spamming idiot.
>
> And you are another genius who doesn't know how to turn off the flu in
> twenty minutes.

Spamming idiot. Tell me, does the virus clear from the body in that time?
Can you do this with AIDS too?

moo

Quantcast