Re: Would patients like to be able to email their doctors?
From: Carey Gregory (tiredofspam123_at_comcast.net)
Date: 12/29/04
- Previous message: Mason A. Clark: "Re: Nobel Prize Committees - Promoting 'NO Peace' And 'NO Science' {HRI 20041214-V1.3} - (Version 1.3 on 28 Dec 2004)"
- In reply to: cicero: "Re: Would patients like to be able to email their doctors?"
- Next in thread: Howard McCollister: "Re: Would patients like to be able to email their doctors?"
- Reply: Howard McCollister: "Re: Would patients like to be able to email their doctors?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:30:31 -0500
"cicero" <maisenberg@comcast.net> wrote:
>It's not really a crusade. More like a "project".
And a big one. Big as in huge, as in years, maybe even decades of work by
many.
>With many comitted
>players--more than 4000 extant local, regional and sectoral health
>networks.
A tiny fraction of the players needed to play, and yet still a huge number.
That's my point. Once you get beyond a group of people who can meet in one
room, the project gets immensely difficult.
>The Markle reports really lay out the best of the collective wisdom of
>health informatics, health engineering, clinical practice, health
>"industry" and others--each of which discipline house some "true
>believers" willing to compromise their own unilateral "best interest"
>in favor of a colelctive "common good."
First off, I would be extremely skeptical of anyone willing to sacrifice
their own best interest for the common good. That makes them either insane,
financially suicidal, or liars. Guess which one I think is most likely.
>What a revolutionary
>concept--think of it--GE, Mass General, HCA, St. Paul, Pharma and
>dozens of others all agreeing to try to achieve the same thing.
Well, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but this isn't revolutionary in
the least. You're heading down a well trodden path and it would behoove you
to look at the experience of those who have gone before you.
(Can you spell "paperless office?")
>Maybe
>it will blow up before being fully realized--just like HCCC (health
>care cost contianment) did after the insurers figured out how to co-opt
>"preferred provider" in the '80s.
More likely it will simply get bogged down in a swamp of competing interests
and differing standards with no compelling financial incentive to make the
differing interests negotiate and compromise. Compromise will be necessary
to make this happen. Now ask yourself why any of the players should
compromise. If you can't think of a compelling answer with demonstrable
*financial* benefits to the players, then the project is little more than a
good idea that's destined for the graveyard of good ideas (which is
currently in danger of overflowing).
- Previous message: Mason A. Clark: "Re: Nobel Prize Committees - Promoting 'NO Peace' And 'NO Science' {HRI 20041214-V1.3} - (Version 1.3 on 28 Dec 2004)"
- In reply to: cicero: "Re: Would patients like to be able to email their doctors?"
- Next in thread: Howard McCollister: "Re: Would patients like to be able to email their doctors?"
- Reply: Howard McCollister: "Re: Would patients like to be able to email their doctors?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|