Re: FOLLOW THE MONEY - Industry shill Elizabeth Whelan claims mercury fears unfounded
From: Ilena Rose (ilena_at_san.rr.com)
Date: 12/29/04
- Next message: Kurt Ullman: "Re: Canadians, a couple of questions about health care"
- Previous message: notritenoteri: "Re: Canadians, a couple of questions about health care"
- In reply to: Jeff: "Re: FOLLOW THE MONEY - Industry shill Elizabeth Whelan claims mercury fears unfounded"
- Next in thread: Jeff: "Re: FOLLOW THE MONEY - Industry shill Elizabeth Whelan claims mercury fears unfounded"
- Reply: Jeff: "Re: FOLLOW THE MONEY - Industry shill Elizabeth Whelan claims mercury fears unfounded"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:29:12 -0600
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:34:40 -0800, "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Yet, the fact remains that mercury fears ARE unfounded. If I am incorrect,
>please provide peer-reviewed evidence to the contrary.
>
>Jeff
>
Peer reviewers like Quack Barrett is for ACSH????
You are blind, deaf and dumber than rocks ... and thank God ... you
never were allowed to have an unrestricted medical license.
- Next message: Kurt Ullman: "Re: Canadians, a couple of questions about health care"
- Previous message: notritenoteri: "Re: Canadians, a couple of questions about health care"
- In reply to: Jeff: "Re: FOLLOW THE MONEY - Industry shill Elizabeth Whelan claims mercury fears unfounded"
- Next in thread: Jeff: "Re: FOLLOW THE MONEY - Industry shill Elizabeth Whelan claims mercury fears unfounded"
- Reply: Jeff: "Re: FOLLOW THE MONEY - Industry shill Elizabeth Whelan claims mercury fears unfounded"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|