Re: Illegal Immigrants Inundate Hospitals

From: Chadwick Stone© (m0rphed_at_m0rphed.m0rphed)
Date: 01/16/05 

Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:42:13 GMT

X-No-Archive: YES
"H. Reader" <historyreader@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:pOqGd.2928$HT6.1118@trnddc04...
>
> "Bill" <xxx@yy.zz> wrote in message
news:r%ZEd.13495$_X7.4387@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
news:QmZEd.596016$O24.90917@news.easynews.com...
> >> X-No-Archive: YES
> >> "Bill" <xxx@yy.zz> wrote in message
> >> news:7lQEd.7994$Vj3.2727@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
> >>>
> >>> "Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
> >>> news:bVPEd.568994$2W1.49115@news.easynews.com...
> >>> > X-No-Archive: YES
> >>> > "Bill" <xxx@yy.zz> wrote in message
> >>> > news:8RPEd.7991$Vj3.6193@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
> >>> >>
> >>> >> "Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
> >>> >> news:0IPEd.568458$lR6.91135@news.easynews.com...
> >>> >> > X-No-Archive: YES
> >>> >> > "Bill" <xxx@yy.zz> wrote in message
> >>> >> > news:9aPEd.13776$by5.3807@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> "Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
> >>> >> >> news:0FOEd.564268$O24.87048@news.easynews.com...
> >>> >> >> >> That makes no sense. You are saying that we should decide our
> >> policy
> >>> >> > based
> >>> >> >> > on
> >>> >> >> >> what Mexico thinks.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > No, I'm saying let Mexico take care of Mexicans and let the
U.S.
> >> take
> >>> >> > care
> >>> >> >> > of U.S. citizens.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > --
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> No that is not what you said. Here is a quote
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> "caving to Mexico's agenda of sending them here."
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Suggesting we should not be caving in. Do you agree that the
"caving
> >>> > in"
> >>> >> > part
> >>> >> >> is irrelevant?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Why must you twist words when you lose an argument?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Only in your mind. Your implication was that we should not allow
> >> Mexican's
> >>> >> here because that is what Mexico wanted. That is what "caving in"
> >> means.
> >>> > My
> >>> >> point was that the US should decide on its own.
> >>> >
> >>> > U.S. citizens ARE the U.S. and guess what? The majority wants to
give
> >>> > illegals the old "foot in the ass" treatment.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> But what does that have to do with caving in?
> >>
> >> Our government, by refusing to send them back _IS_ caving - and caving
to
> >> foreign interests, at that. They are not serving the best interests of
the
> >> U.S. and they are not complying with the will of the people.
> >>
> >
> >
> > You really are missing the point. Work with me here. All of what you say
may or man not be true. What I am saying
> > is that it is wrong to make policy based on "caving in" It would be like
saying I will not give into my wife (no
> > matter wherther she is right or wrong) because that would "caving in"
>
> Talk about missing the point...

He also missed my plonk. 

--
                          Chadwick Stone©
 Formerly the AFA-B Sovereign Sockpuppet©
   "No longer anonymous but still immune"
            Usenet's most helpful netizen
     SovereignSockpuppet at Yahoo dot com
     Benevolent Order of the Pointy Stick
            Skepticult® ID: 581-00504-208
                 A mean and nasty ***
                 I am the New World Order