Re: Two pounds a day

From: Bob (this one) (Bob_at_nospam.com)
Date: 02/14/05 

Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:37:02 -0500

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> "Bob (this one)" wrote:
>
>>John wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:22:53 -0800, "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1108327640.8aaf75fec30277bda1cd50a1c1593aed@teranews...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Bob (this one)" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>><hiss sputter hiss hiss Hitler ate two pounds of chocolate a day hiss
>>>>
>>>>sputter hiss hiss He's my hero hiss sputter hiss hiss>
>>>>
>>>>Wow, Andy. Besides cross-posting, you're now engaged in a blatant lie.
>>>>AFAIK, Bob has never asserted that Hitler is his hero. Your lie is very
>>>>"un-Christian", but understandable given your current state of mind (you're
>>>>clearly upset by Bob's posts, but that does not justify lying).
>>>
>>>
>>>v. lied, ly·ing, (lng) lies
>>>v. intr.
>>>1.To present false information with the intention of deceiving.
>>>2.To convey a false image or impression: Appearances often lie.
>>>
>>>So where exactly is Dr. Chung's intent of deceiving? Gee, isn't
>>>Bob's original post right above Dr. Chung's post?
>>
>>Could you be more fuckwittedly stupid? Rhetorical...
>>
>>Chung changed what I wrote. That makes it dishonest.
>>
>>
>>>I.e., Bob speaks
>>>for himself, doesn't he?
>>
>>Yes. But when Chung changes it, then it isn't me any more even though
>>he leaves the attribution as though it were. Too fast for you? Too
>>complicated?
>>
>>
>>>Are you possibly lying yourself by falsely
>>>accusing another of lying?
>>>
>>>Just asking.
>>
>>Aren't you, though. And your intent is as honest as Chung's.
>>
>>I guess you can be more fuckwittedly stupid.
>>
>>Bob
>
>
> Yet again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:
>
> 11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
> say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
> because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
> persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Oh, look. Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to
several rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem
to understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad
news is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about
"because of me" is scrutinized, then Chung and John are both big
losers. The criticisms of both these God-besotted cranks is for their
words and actions, not their beliefs.

> And so "John" is blessed by God.

And so Chung renders another judgement. As worthy as usual.

Poor guy can't even seem to be consistent. Well except for his OCD and
his paranoiac ideation. And his hyperreligiosity. And his duplicity.

What a guy...

If he didn't have macros, he'd never be able to "communicate" with others.

Bob

Quantcast