Re: Two pounds a day

From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD (andrew_at_heartmdphd.com)
Date: 02/15/05 

Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:59:08 -0500

Without God, all are fools.

You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Christ's name.

May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
you too will have eternal life and the limitlessly interesting riches of
His everlasting kingdom.

Here's how:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His
presence known here on Usenet :-)

Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.

Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

At His service,

Andrew 

-- 
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD 
Board-Certified Cardiologist 
** 
Suggested Reading: 
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A 
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A 
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A 
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A 
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A 
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
"Bob (this one)" wrote:
> 
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> > "Bob (this one)" wrote:
> >
> >>Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>It seems you would try to "intercept" God's blessings.
> >>
> >>Wow. What logical and  brilliant writing. So clear. So useful. So rich
> >>a demented non sequitur.
> >>
> >>Nothing new.
> >>
> >>Bob
> >
> > Truth tends to confound the untruthful.
> 
> OH, right. I keep forgetting your apparently infinite capacity for
> schizophrenic, almost-meaning, aphoristic pronouncements.
> 
> But what do we learn when a world-class non sequitur is justified by
> yet another non sequitur? I discern that we learn about mental
> disturbance and OCD Scrupulosity. I discern that the mind that
> conceives of these contentless exercises has a desperate need to
> withstand all the sneers, condemnations, rebuttals it seems to
> deliberately invite. Not merely withstand, triumph over - a zero-sum
> game. It's like that schoolyard idiot who wants to fight with everyone
> and loses very often. But still claims victory and  acts as though
> he's still in the game. Like the Monty Python knight at the bridge.
> 
> Dressing yourself in mismatched, unwisely picked and chosen raiment of
> the bible still leaves you intellectually and spiritually naked. Fools
> are fools no matter what they cloak themselves in.
> 
> Bob
Quantcast