Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: jason@xxxxxxxxxx (Jason)
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:31:45 -0700
In article <dfqn91tu04v56uagh32e70c0daqaatmp5u@xxxxxxx>, Carey Gregory
<tiredofspam123@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> jason@xxxxxxxxxx (Jason) wrote:
>
> >If you are not a doctor, I hope that you will also tell people in your posts:
> >"I am not a doctor, or any sort of trained medical professional, and I
> >have no idea what I'm talking about, even when it sounds like I do."
>
> You just refuse to "get it," don't you?
>
> David doesn't need a disclaimer like that as you do. Unlike you, his track
> record is solid and he clearly has knowledge and good judgment on when and
> what to answer, and when and what not to answer. On the occasions David
> gives medical advice at all -- which is rare, just as it is for most of us
> -- he does so only when it's obvious enough to be answered here on a
> newsgroup, and only when he's sure of his facts. That's probably the
> primary reason you see questions go unanswered -- their question can't be
> answered "safely."
>
> As Dr. Fink pointed out, providing medical advice via the internet is
> inherently flawed to begin with. Most of us recognize that so we do so only
> rarely, and only when we feel it's "safe." Yes, some of us do answer on
> occasion because we feel it's important and we're sure the answer we're
> giving is correct. Sometimes we can put someone's mind at ease, or
> sometimes do the opposite and urge them to seek help immediately, or maybe
> offer some insight they haven't considered, but I think you'll find it's
> rare that such advice is given without qualification and a warning to seek
> professional medical advice.
>
> >In addition, unless
> >we have lots of wonderful doctors and nurses that subscribe to this
> >newsgroup--not very many people will ever get any advice from anyone.
>
> To quote a previous poster.... You say that like it's a bad thing.
>
> This is not alt.support.med. This is sci.med. Please try to comprehend the
> difference. It was never intended for medical advice and still isn't, but
> if you insist on doing so, you damn well better get your facts straight or
> you should be prepared to have a new orifice drilled in your backside every
> time you screw up. We may not be good at answering every question, but
> we're very good at spotting bad answers.
>
> And, if you consider that it's sci.med rather than alt.support.med, that's
> exactly as it should be.
I might join the critics instead of trying to help people. Since so many
people enjoy that hobby--it must be lots of fun. If I don't enjoy the
hobby--I'll try to find another hobby. I'll just tell the kind people that
take time out of their busy days to help people such things as:: "You are
stupid--you don't know anything about medical issues--you should not have
tried to help this person since you are not a doctor."
It must be a wonderful hobby since several people in this newsgroup
including yourself seem to enjoy your hobby so much.
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: Carey Gregory
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- References:
- Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: Jason
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: Tom Salls
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: Jason
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: David Wright
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: Jason
- Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- From: Carey Gregory
- Safety of anal intercourse.
- Prev by Date: Re: My love-handle has an irregular "heart-beat"!
- Next by Date: Re: Did I just have a stroke?
- Previous by thread: Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- Next by thread: Re: Safety of anal intercourse.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|