likely no safe level of exposure to radiation



"The health risks - particularly the development of solid cancers in
organs - rise proportionally with exposure."


http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2005/06/29/radiation-risks050629.html


Low-dose radiation poses small cancer risk: report
Last Updated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:13:43 EDT
CBC News

There is likely no such thing as a safe level of exposure to radiation,
although cancer is rarely induced by low doses, a panel of U.S.
scientists said Wednesday.

"The scientific research base shows that there is no threshold of
exposure below which low levels of ionized radiation can be
demonstrated to be harmless or beneficial," said Richard Monson, the
panel's chair and a professor of epidemiology at Harvard's School of
Public Health.
Most people are exposed to less than 100 millisieverts of radiation
over their lives, the equivalent of 10 chest X-rays.

"The health risks - particularly the development of solid cancers in
organs - rise proportionally with exposure."

The panel's report addresses amounts of radiation from medical
treatments. The findings are expected to affect government safety
recommendations in the U.S.

A low dose of 100 millisieverts of radiation - the equivalent of 10
chest X-rays - is expected to cause solid cancer or leukemia in one
out of 100 people over a lifetime, the report said. About half of those
cases could be fatal.

The panel's report updates research based largely on survivors of the
1945 atomic bomb attacks in Japan.

While medical radiation is often appropriate, "exposure to any
unnecessary radiation should be avoided," Monson told a news
conference. "And what is unnecessary is up to an individual."

Natural sources of radiation such as gamma rays from space and radon in
the environment account for about 82 per cent of our exposure, the
report said.

More research is needed on those who receive frequent doses such as
full-body CT scans, and on children who get X-rays or radiation
treatment for cancer, the panel said.

Research on more than 400,000 nuclear industry workers found they had a
10 per cent higher risk of death from cancer, according to a related
report released Wednesday by the International Agency for Research on
Cancer in France.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Aussies moving underground to escape summer heat
    ... > worry about cancer. ... The term he used was "radiation ... hormesis," meaning that the health related effects of radiation exposure ... might be health benefits associated with increased exposure, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Aussies moving underground to escape summer heat
    ... He found that there was significantly less cancer ... > in the homes with the higher levels. ... The term he used was "radiation ... > hormesis," meaning that the health related effects of radiation exposure ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: OT - Before I Die ( Part 1)
    ... Joint Effects of Radiation and Smoking on Lung Cancer Risk among Atomic ... Results are given on the joint effect of radiation exposure and cigarette ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Is it this easy to live on Mars?
    ... repeating the same lies over and over they'll gain some currency. ... We know the radiation levels on Mars unsheilded surface - less than 8 ... during the exposure, ... The risk of uterine or testicular cancer is increases by ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Quickly Vetted, Treatment Is Offered to Patients
    ... Treatment Is Offered to Patients ... After a surgeon removed a cancerous lump from Karen Medlock’s breast in November, he recommended radiation, a routine next step meant to keep cancer from recurring. ... But he did not send her for the kind of radiation most women have received for decades. ... Only when Ms. Medlock, 49, sought a second opinion did she learn a startling truth: MammoSite is still highly experimental. ...
    (soc.senior.issues)

Loading