Re: Purified water versus tap water
- From: wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David Wright)
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:51:10 GMT
In article <1121712725.185682.143440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<NozomiMomi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Are there any health benefits in drinking purified water as compared to
>tap water or is it mainly an issue of taste? I live in a large US city,
>and the tap water tastes horrid, but I don't think that it can actually
>affect my health (although I have been told so). Have there been any
>studies done on this?
The chlorine in tap water is probably responsible for some small
number of cases of bladder cancer every year, though I'm not sure
how well established this is. (The cost of not disinfecting the
water is higher, of course.) So a filter that removes chlorine
might be worth having if you consume tap water.
Your local water almost certainly isn't harmful, but if you don't
like the taste of it, get a filter.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"I believe The Battle of the Network Stars should be fought with guns."
-- Steve Martin
.
- References:
- Purified water versus tap water
- From: NozomiMomi
- Purified water versus tap water
- Prev by Date: Re: Purified water versus tap water
- Next by Date: Re: Purified water versus tap water
- Previous by thread: Re: Purified water versus tap water
- Next by thread: Re: boycotting is my new drug of choice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|