Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- From: John Schutkeker <jschutkeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:30:51 GMT
"Howard McCollister" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:42fd0fb2$0$16191
$bb4e3ad8@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
> "John Schutkeker" <jschutkeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Xns96B08DAF21577lkajehoriuasldfjknak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "Howard McCollister" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> news:42fb43b5$0$90582$bb4e3ad8@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>>> Esophageal allograft transplants are generally unnecessary. If a
>>> person's esophagus needs to be removed, it is replaced with a portion
>>> of the patient's colon, or by creating a tube out of the stomach and
>>> pulling it up , sewing it proximally in the chest or in the neck. This
>>> generally works well and provides no rejection problem.
>>
>> Then why are bypasses necessary?
>
> There's no such thing as an esophageal bypass.
Then what's the name of the surgery to allow a patient to feed himself
through a tube in his side, squirting liquified food directly into his
stomach? It certainly does bypass the esophagus!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- From: Howard McCollister
- Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- References:
- Why No GI Transplants?
- From: John Schutkeker
- Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- From: Jeff
- Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- From: John Schutkeker
- Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- From: Howard McCollister
- Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- From: John Schutkeker
- Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- From: Howard McCollister
- Why No GI Transplants?
- Prev by Date: schizophrenia and DHEA
- Next by Date: Esophageal Stent?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- Next by thread: Re: Why No GI Transplants?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|