Re: online cash for docs


Howard McCollister wrote:
> "fresh~horses" <fresh~horses@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1127441989.660959.282120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I'm going to read this over, think about it carefully, and ponder on
> > how I can tell you why I disagree with you, in as unemotional a way as
> > possible. However, if I think *that* isn't possible...
> >
>
> Hey Zee, you don't need to think about it - your arguments will certainly be
> contained within this article:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/22/business/22devices.html?pagewanted=4
>
> HMc



Yes, some of my arguments may be there.

I have thought about it Howard. From your perspective now too, but for
some time as one who carries a device deployed in me in off-label use
by a surgeon who thought there was no need to ask my permission or tell
me I was part of an experiment.

.

Relevant Pages