Re: The Bizarre Claims of Stephen Barrett, M.D.

On Jul 14, 3:22 pm, Alan_K...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
The fact that you think you're right and various others are wrong about MCS doesn't make Hulda Clark an authority about anything.

Clumsy try at changing the subject, David; but nobody, except for the
circle-jerk that is the medical-establishment, cares who's an
'authority'.

It's simply a matter of verifying the facts. Parasite infestation,
especially worms and flukes is not a major factor in the US due to
sanitation and animal handling laws.
It is fairly easy to check for ovum and parasites in stool. The vast
majority of the stool examinations are negative.

Clumsy try at changing the subject.

Not at all. The subject remains that Stephen Barrett, M.D., is absurd
and bizarre in decrying Hulda Clark's beliefs.

Beliefs do not consititute facts. Try studying the facts. If there
were a lot of people with confirmed parasite infestion then such a
hypothesis would be one to look at. They literally look at the tissue
in search for histological pathology. If the worms are there then they
would be seen.


[Southeast Asia is] where [Fasciolopsis buski] lives.

Why do you believe that?

Try looking up the lifecycle of the parasite and that should answer
most of your questions. I know from professional experience that
Fasciolopsis is extremely rare in the US. The eggs are very prominent
and quite noticeable and not very easily missed.

Flukes in general when associated with the liver and gallbladder have
been postulated to be a cause of cancer in such organs.

I remember one case in which the gallbladder was taken out and
reveiled the flukes in a asian.

To extrapolate that worms cause most diseases is bizarre and absurd.
There is no facts there. The lack of facts does not consitute proof.



.