Statins
- From: Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:13:46 GMT
Someone close to me has seen her total cholesterol gradually climb to just north of 240 (I don't have the lab report in front of me--her LDL is elevated slightly, but her HDL is good--164, I think).
She is by inclination averse to taking meds, and her trusted internist wants her to go on a statin.
I am caught between my general inclination to do what the good doctor tells me to, and my increasing apprehension about the news coming out every day--about docs getting perks from pharma companies, about NIH study groups packed with doctors who have a financial interest in the drugs they are recommending (etc, etc.--I tell you this not to stir up trouble--I've been on the receiving end of the assault by alternative groups beating me up on amalgam, root canals, x-rays, etc.).
Most of what I've gathered on the web indicates to me that the serious risks (hepatotoxicity, rhabdomyolysis) are pretty small. What I really want to know is whether statins aren't being over-recommended. Specifically, I am thrown by stats I see that while women with elevated cholesterol put on statins suffer lower incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, but that the overall death rate is not decreased. The other snippet I see (sorry, I don't have the source in front of me) is that HDL levels have a far greater predictive significance in development of cardiovascular disease than do either total blood cholesterol or LDL levels.
Can someone parse these issues out for me?
TIA,
Steve
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Statins
- From: Ray Johnstone
- Re: Statins
- From: David Rind
- Re: Statins
- From: Robert1
- Re: Statins
- Prev by Date: severe knee pain
- Next by Date: Re: Statins
- Previous by thread: severe knee pain
- Next by thread: Re: Statins
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|