Re: Specificity and sensitivity
- From: Robert1 <Goldentouchman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:37:54 -0700
On Sep 10, 4:44 pm, quebecs...@xxxxxxx wrote:
Dear forum
I am trying to answer questions regarding medical screening, and
medical testing.
My biostatistics professor asked the following two questions:
1/Specificity and sensitivity are really important for what kind of
study/test?
2/For what kind of study/test is it important to think about the
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV)?
I thought that sens/specificity was the analog of NPV/PPV. I need more
insight.
Can anybody help?
Many thanks for your help.
The population of individuals without disease is the focus of
specificity. It identifies the characteristic effectiveness of a test
to correctly identify those without disease.
The formula for specificity is (true negatives/ true negatives plus
false positives) X100
The population of individuals who have disease is the focus of
sensitivity. It is the capacity of a test in identifying individuals
with disease.
The formula for that is (true positives/ true positives plus false
negatives) X 100
The population of individuals with a positive test result is the focus
of positive predictive value and the negative predictive value are
those with a negative result that indicates the likelihood that a
negative test result identifies someone without disease.
Those are all the populations that they represent.
.
- References:
- Specificity and sensitivity
- From: quebecstat
- Specificity and sensitivity
- Prev by Date: safe scratching with hairdryer
- Next by Date: Re: Specificity and sensitivity
- Previous by thread: Re: Specificity and sensitivity
- Next by thread: safe scratching with hairdryer
- Index(es):