Re: Comet deflection
From: John Schilling (schillin_at_spock.usc.edu)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: Taki Kogoma: "Re: tank barrel"
- Previous message: One Usenet Poster: "Re: tank barrel"
- In reply to: Carl Alex Friis Nielsen: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Next in thread: TomR: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Reply: TomR: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Reply: Jim Lillie: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:25:10 -0700 To: sci-military-moderated@moderators.isc.org
"Carl Alex Friis Nielsen" <cafn@get2net.dk> writes:
>Juergen Nieveler skrev i meddelelsen ...
>>The energy transferred would still be about the same, though...
>A 0,01 kg projectile moving at 300 m/s has a kinetic energy of 450 J
>A 10 kg projectile with a kinetic energy of 450 J moves at 0,3 m/s
Danger, Will Robinson! Math Error Detected! Danger, Danger!
A ten-kilogram projectile with a kinetic energy of 450 Joules will
have a velocity of 9.5 meters per second, twenty miles per hour or
thirty-five kilometers per hour for those more accustomed to thinking
in those terms.
>If both projectiles transfer their entire energy to your body, do you
>then have a preference for which you prefer to be hit by ?
Whichever one has the greatest projected surface area to spread the
impact over.
>While you could be hurt by the 10 kg projectile you could probably
>catch it unhurt if you were aware it was coming.
I'd like to see you try to catch the 10 kg, 450 J projectile. No,
rephrase that. I'd like to see someone I really don't like, try that
stunt.
-- *John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, * *Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" * *Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition * *White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute * *schillin@spock.usc.edu * for success" * *661-718-0955 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *
- Next message: Taki Kogoma: "Re: tank barrel"
- Previous message: One Usenet Poster: "Re: tank barrel"
- In reply to: Carl Alex Friis Nielsen: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Next in thread: TomR: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Reply: TomR: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Reply: Jim Lillie: "Re: Comet deflection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|