Re: Jamming IEDs
dumpster4_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Eivind Krokeide: "Re: Jamming IEDs"
- Previous message: Par Leijonhufvud: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- In reply to: stork: "Jamming IEDs"
- Next in thread: Eivind Krokeide: "Re: Jamming IEDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
To: sci-military-moderated@moderators.isc.org Date: 24 Jan 2005 09:29:33 -0800
stork wrote:
> Is it the case in Iraq that most IEDs are detonated remotely? If so,
> why do we not have jammers that simply shroud convoys in a circular
> bubble of electronic activity that prevents the detonation of a
device
> because the command to do so is jammed?
The Army already has a system called "Warlock" that does that, and
more of them have been ordered. See:
http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004/1129/web-ied-12-03-04.asp
- Next message: Eivind Krokeide: "Re: Jamming IEDs"
- Previous message: Par Leijonhufvud: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- In reply to: stork: "Jamming IEDs"
- Next in thread: Eivind Krokeide: "Re: Jamming IEDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|