Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)
From: CJ Adams (bluebell_at_start.ca)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: Risto Rautiainen: "Re: Silk body armor"
- Previous message: Paul Saccani: "Re: Blue on Blue in Iraq"
- In reply to: sddso: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- Next in thread: Richard Hem: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- Reply: Richard Hem: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
To: sci-military-moderated@moderators.isc.org Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 01:33:13 -0500
"sddso" <jspragg@iw.net> wrote
(re: the Canadian FNC2A1)
> My apologies. My source (_Small Arms of the World_, 10th or 11th edition,
> can't recall which) had a dim opinion of the C2's feed reliability.
>
> Good to know you worked the bugs out.
Hmm. I have dim opinion of the reference. From what I remember in the
distant, distant past there weren't any feed problems and I recall once
going over all the C2 tech orders from Day One. The FNC2 wasn't the very
best of LMGs, but it fired reliably.
It worked for me, and I got 'marksman' on the range -- which in our system
was as good as you could do. Mind you, I was a great big SOB and that
probably helped. Burned my hand, too.
Cheers
CJ Adams
(Ouch! JEEZ! That smarts!)
- Next message: Risto Rautiainen: "Re: Silk body armor"
- Previous message: Paul Saccani: "Re: Blue on Blue in Iraq"
- In reply to: sddso: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- Next in thread: Richard Hem: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- Reply: Richard Hem: "Re: Bullpups advance (slowly)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]