Re: Jamming IEDs

From: nospam (nospam_at_nospam.net)
Date: 03/23/05


Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:55:59 -0800

Paul Saccani wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2005 19:17:48 GMT, Juergen Nieveler <juergen.nieveler.nospam@arcor.de>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Paul Saccani <traptinnedspicedham@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Good news, but of course I'd use decent ciphers etc. anyway, or for
>>>>the really critical stuff use a one-time-pad :-)
>>>
>>>You do know that they can be broken, don't you?
>>
>>Only if you use a random number generator that isn't completely random,
>>or if you reuse the pad.
>
>
> A few other issues too, but you've got the idea.
>
> I'd be interested to know what you feel would be a completely random random
> number generator.
>
> cheers,
>
> Paul Saccani
> Newman West Australia
>
> A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of a message.
> Q: Why is top posting a sloppy form of writing?

A: Because it means you don't have to read through a
lengthy thread to see the latest comments.

Q: Why is top posting an efficient use of everyone's time?

It helps a lot to keep the messages short when using
one-time pads. The longer the message, the easier to break.