Re: Jamming IEDs
From: nospam (nospam_at_nospam.net)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:55:59 -0800
Paul Saccani wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2005 19:17:48 GMT, Juergen Nieveler <email@example.com>
>>Paul Saccani <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>>Good news, but of course I'd use decent ciphers etc. anyway, or for
>>>>the really critical stuff use a one-time-pad :-)
>>>You do know that they can be broken, don't you?
>>Only if you use a random number generator that isn't completely random,
>>or if you reuse the pad.
> A few other issues too, but you've got the idea.
> I'd be interested to know what you feel would be a completely random random
> number generator.
> Paul Saccani
> Newman West Australia
> A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of a message.
> Q: Why is top posting a sloppy form of writing?
A: Because it means you don't have to read through a
lengthy thread to see the latest comments.
Q: Why is top posting an efficient use of everyone's time?
It helps a lot to keep the messages short when using
one-time pads. The longer the message, the easier to break.