Re: Assault guns
- From: "Thomas Schoene" <taschoene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:47:49 GMT
Howard Berkowitz wrote:
> Let me speak to the direct fire role, a heavier caliber moving with
> assault units. Isn't the heavy antitank and bunker destruction role
> now a missile function? In the former, the US approach would
> be some TOW carrier, be it ITV, Bradley, TOW Humvee, or
> helicopter.
>
> TOWs have been used against bunkers,
...often enough that there's now a TOW Bunker Buster version with a blast
warhead instead of the tandem shaped charge.
but I'm blanking on the name of
> the new man-portable system for which the Marines have an anti-bunker
> warhead and the Army antitank.
Probably you're thinking of Predator/SRAW (Short-Range Assault Weapon)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/sraw.htm
--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when
wrong to be put right." - Senator Carl Schurz, 1872
.
- References:
- Re: Assault guns
- From: Howard Berkowitz
- Re: Assault guns
- Prev by Date: Re: Any studies on Soviet invasion of the Kuriles, August 1945
- Next by Date: Re: Howitzer & Tank "Bustle" On Barrels: Purpose Of, And Function (gas extractor ?) ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Assault guns
- Next by thread: Re: Any studies on Soviet invasion of the Kuriles, August 1945
- Index(es):