Re: Early cartridge rifles
- From: bb_43@xxxxxxxxxxx (Brian Bunin)
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:18:40 GMT
In article <1131107849.200588.176950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>Nicholas Smid wrote:
>> Over the years I've read a fair bit about the first generation black powder
>> cartridge rifles. The two you hear most about are the Martini Henry and
>> Springfield Allen conversion, both of which had a reputation for extraction
>> problems when they got hot. I wonder did others like the 1871 Mauser and
>> Gras 1874 have the same problems?
>
>I expect so. I think that there was a basic problem of accumulated
>chamber fouling which tended to gum up the works after a spell of
>intense firing; that apparently happened at Rorke's Drift.
>
>Tony Williams
>Military gun and ammunition website: http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
>
Wasn't one of the other problems the state of metalurgy, in terms of the brass
cartridges being constructed in two pieces, such that the base could be torn
off, if the walls got stuck in the chamber? ISTR that there were a number of
Custer's men found with their rifles rendered inoperative by that problem....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Early cartridge rifles
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Re: Early cartridge rifles
- References:
- Early cartridge rifles
- From: Nicholas Smid
- Re: Early cartridge rifles
- From: Tony . Williams
- Early cartridge rifles
- Prev by Date: Re: modern naval fighter procurement
- Next by Date: Re: Sniping?
- Previous by thread: Re: Early cartridge rifles
- Next by thread: Re: Early cartridge rifles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|