Re: Implosives?
- From: raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Roger Moore)
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:07:08 +0000 (UTC)
Colin Campbell <activated_95b@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove underscore)> writes:
>On 19 Jan 2006 01:06:40 -0800, manofsan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>Is there any known example of such an "implosive"?
>The Watt steam engine?
>IIRC it achieved more power by injecting cold water into the cylinder
>after the steam had forced the piston back.
You're thinking of the Newcomen engine, not the Watt engine. The Newcomen
engine derived all of its power from condensation. It used a
counterweight to pull the piston up and fill the cylinder with steam and
then water to condense the steam and pull the cylinder back down. The
major advance of the Watt engine was using a separate condenser, which
greatly improved the thermal efficiency, and hence fuel consumption, of
the engine.
--
Roger Moore | Master of Meaningless Trivia | (raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
There's no point in questioning authority if you don't listen to the answers.
.
- References:
- XM109 + G11 = ???
- From: manofsan
- Re: XM109 + G11 = ???
- From: manofsan
- Re: XM109 + G11 = ???
- From: Airborne!
- XM109 + G11 = ???
- Prev by Date: Re: 7 x 33 mm Kurz
- Next by Date: Re: MLRS going to all guided rockets
- Previous by thread: Re: XM109 + G11 = ???
- Next by thread: What gas mask is this?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|