Re: What practical uses is nanotechnology achieving now?
From: Kadamose (Kada_at_myway.com)
Date: 08/13/04
- Previous message: puggy: "Re: What practical uses is nanotechnology achieving now?"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: What practical uses is nanotechnology achieving now?"
- Next in thread: Oliver 'Ojo' Bedford: "Re: What practical uses is nanotechnology achieving now?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Aug 2004 23:53:45 GMT
On 13 Aug 2004 19:09:48 GMT, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:
>
>Isn't it sort of nervy for "nanotechnology" to claim credit for
>semiconductors (which have been steadily shrinking for decades now)
>and biological and chemical systems? That's declaring victory without
>firing a shot.
>
>The nano people even seem to take credit for MEMS gadgets, which
>aren't nano scale at all.
>
>John
>
Nanotechnology isn't 'claiming' credit for anything. Instead, it's
scientists and engineers trying to take credit for nanotechnology
before the true nanotech gets here - in other words, it's a marketing
scheme. (i.e. Dockers and their lame nano pants.)
- Previous message: puggy: "Re: What practical uses is nanotechnology achieving now?"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: What practical uses is nanotechnology achieving now?"
- Next in thread: Oliver 'Ojo' Bedford: "Re: What practical uses is nanotechnology achieving now?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|