RE: [Sci.nanotech] Re: bacteria building nanobots

From: Meagley, Robert P (robert.p.meagley_at_intel.com)
Date: 08/22/04


Date: 22 Aug 2004 04:52:02 GMT


See for example: http://wi.mit.edu/nap/2002/nap_feature_abalone.html

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: sci.nanotech-bounces@nano-tek.org
[mailto:sci.nanotech-bounces@nano-tek.org] On Behalf Of Jim Logajan
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 10:36 PM
To: sci.nanotech@nano-tek.org
Subject: [Sci.nanotech] Re: bacteria building nanobots

defiant_whispers@hotmail.com (defiant_whispers) wrote:
> I am a student hoping to start a career in the sci-fi book field.

Good luck! Just remember you'll also need a job that pays the bills. :-)

> I am currently doing research for a novel that I plan to write
involving
> nanotechnology. I have heard it said that nanobots are a long way
> away from being developed and that genetically modified bacteria
> (meant to do a specific job) will really be considered our first
> "nanobots." I was wondering, that if this is true, than couldn't
> these bacteria be geneitcally programmed to build actuall nanobots
> from available material in a certain invironment... like say... the
> human body?

Sounds like you have a horror story in mind. ;-)

> Since nanobots would need to be built with chemicals at a
> molecular level anyway, it wouldn't really matter that something
> organic was building something that could be considered synthetic...
> would it?

Theorectically it shouldn't matter.

> This would also solve the problem of needing nanofactories
> to build nanobots. The bacteria would be able to do it. If it is
> found that building something as complex as a nanobot would be too
> much to ask of one bacteria (or would that be bacterium?)

"Bacteria" and "bacterium" appear to be synonyms.

> than couldn't you just program many bacteria to do many different
> jobs.. sort of making an assembly line for nanobots?

An assembly line implies directed motion. Biology at the cellular level=20
generally relies on heuristic motions. Their operation is not=20
deterministic, while macro-sized machines are. It is the deterministic=20
nature of Drexler's molecular nanotechnology that yields all the
wonderful=20
possibilities.

So while a line of bacteria, each one doing a different job, might be
made=20
into an assembly line, the design effort would be better spent on=20
deterministic operations from the very start.

_______________________________________________
sci.nanotech mailing list
sci.nanotech@nano-tek.org
http://venusia.golgothe.net/mailman/listinfo/sci.nanotech



Relevant Pages

  • Re: bacteria building nanobots
    ... I have heard it said that nanobots are a long way ... > these bacteria be geneitcally programmed to build actuall nanobots ... An assembly line implies directed motion. ... deterministic operations from the very start. ...
    (sci.nanotech)
  • Re: is submicron and neno same
    ... >> nanobots as if anybody had any idea about how to go about making such a ... > Well viruses and some bacteria are on the nanoscale. ... > peptide nucleic acid instead of DNA and will be fed on fatty acid ... > up without basis in known science". ...
    (sci.nanotech)
  • bacteria building nanobots
    ... am currently doing research for a novel that I plan to write involving ... I have heard it said that nanobots are a long way ... these bacteria be geneitcally programmed to build actuall nanobots ...
    (sci.nanotech)

Quantcast