Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: End of lithography at 32 nm?
From: John Larkin (jjlarkin_at_highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Oliver 'Ojo' Bedford: "Re: viscosity and specific surface area"
- Previous message: Howard Lovy: "What's New on Howard Lovy's NanoBot"
- Next in thread: Jim Logajan: "Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: End of lithography at 32 nm?"
- Reply: Jim Logajan: "Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: End of lithography at 32 nm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 31 Aug 2004 16:30:12 GMT
On 30 Aug 2004 00:40:28 GMT, Jim Logajan <JamesL@lugoj.com> wrote:
>
>erincss@aol.com (erincss) wrote:
>> well how far can micrometer chips built in three dimensions go, if
>> done using modern techniques?
>
>Not very far.
>
>Lithography and related technologies are modestly fast ways to duplicate 2-
>D patterns from a set of templates.
Modestly fast? Exposing a billion features in one second? What's much
faster?
John
- Next message: Oliver 'Ojo' Bedford: "Re: viscosity and specific surface area"
- Previous message: Howard Lovy: "What's New on Howard Lovy's NanoBot"
- Next in thread: Jim Logajan: "Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: End of lithography at 32 nm?"
- Reply: Jim Logajan: "Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: End of lithography at 32 nm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]