Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize"
From: John Larkin (jjlarkin_at_highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: Prof. Dr. Eric S. Kong: "nanocrystal quantum dots"
- Previous message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- In reply to: Russell Wallace: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Next in thread: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Reply: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Oct 2004 16:23:24 GMT
On 15 Oct 2004 16:18:23 GMT, wallacethinmintr@eircom.net (Russell
Wallace) wrote:
>We're a lot more than 5 years from that being possible (unless you're
>willing to define complex components as raw materials, in which case
>the result wouldn't be useful).
>
I wonder why difficult things are always 5-10 years away. Why never
500, or 5000?
John
- Next message: Prof. Dr. Eric S. Kong: "nanocrystal quantum dots"
- Previous message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- In reply to: Russell Wallace: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Next in thread: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Reply: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]