Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize"
From: John Larkin (jjlarkin_at_highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Previous message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- In reply to: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Next in thread: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Reply: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Reply: Jim Logajan: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Oct 2004 22:30:06 GMT
On 27 Oct 2004 02:02:04 GMT, "Glenn Martin" <jscott3256@home.com>
wrote:
>
> A good target is something simple (only a few steps or just one to the
>process) with near term applications. A molecular device that could add
>rows to a spiral fullerine tube might fit the bill. The ability to grow
>concievably endless lengths of carbon nanotube would find ready use in the
>materials field.
> The device would have to be 'seeded' with premade tubes and fed simple,
>pre-synthesized carbon molecular fragments to add on. A delivery medium
>would have to be settles on (Perhaps some fluid). Some kind of substrate
>for the device to affix to so you wouldn't end up with a useless tangle.
> Do this and not only would you kick off serious interest in assembly
>technology, you'd also make a mint.
>
>Glenn Martin
>
>
Has anyone, ever, synthesized any molecule using a nanotech assembler?
Even three atoms, say?
Assembling nanotubes likely wouldn't be profitable unless you could do
many trillions of atoms per second.
John
- Next message: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Previous message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- In reply to: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Next in thread: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Reply: Glenn Martin: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Reply: Jim Logajan: "Re: Nanotechnology "X Prize""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|