Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes
From: Danny at Chrastina dot net (danny_at_chrastina.notreally)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: Jimi: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Previous message: d.webb_at_mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- In reply to: d.webb_at_mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Next in thread: Jimi: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Reply: Jimi: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Jan 2005 20:17:26 GMT
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 d.webb@mdx.ac.uk wrote:
> In article <cr6p0e02ma@enews1.newsguy.com>, Jimi <mraluminum@shaw.ca>
> writes:
>
>> I believe it will be possible to lock all the plates but a planetwide
>> cooling system would have to be put in place to prevent catastrophe on
>> a global scale. clearly, the world economy will not be able to support
>> a megaproject like this for many hundreds if not thousands of years.
>> by this time, of course, sufficient computing power will be available
>> to accurately design such a system.
>
> ... as well as a global cooling system to ensure that you did not get a
> continual pressure build up leading to an even more catastrophic outcome
> than normal earthquakes you would also need to find a way of recycling
> carbon and probably a number of other beneficial side-effects of plate
> tectonics.
Without plate tectonics there would be no mountain building
(orogeny) so erosion would eventually turn the whole Earth into ocean.
-- Dr. Danny Chrastina. Office: +39 031 3327612 Everywhere else: +39 333 2825623 http://www.chrastina.net/
- Next message: Jimi: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Previous message: d.webb_at_mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- In reply to: d.webb_at_mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Next in thread: Jimi: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Reply: Jimi: "Re: Nanotechnology and earthquakes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|